O'Leary A, Ambrose T K, Raffaelli M, Maibach E, Jemmott L S, Jemmott J B, Labouvie E, Celentano D
Rutgers University Department of Psychology, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
AIDS Educ Prev. 1998 Dec;10(6):483-92.
A 10-hour small-group informational and skill-building intervention was tested among patients (N = 472) attending publicly funded sexually transmitted disease clinics in Maryland, Georgia, and New Jersey. After completing a 90-minute interview concerning HIV risk behaviors, condom use self-efficacy and condom outcome expectancies, participants were randomized to either an intervention or a control condition. Participants in both conditions displayed significant reductions in unprotected encounters and number of partners and increases in condom use. No differences between treatment conditions were observed, indicating that the motivational effects of the interview may have been stronger than the effects of the intervention in this population.
在马里兰州、佐治亚州和新泽西州由公共资金资助的性传播疾病诊所就诊的患者（N = 472）中，对一项为期10小时的小组信息与技能培养干预措施进行了测试。在完成一项关于艾滋病毒风险行为、避孕套使用自我效能感和避孕套结果预期的90分钟访谈后，参与者被随机分配到干预组或对照组。两组参与者的无保护性行为和性伴侣数量均显著减少，避孕套使用增加。未观察到治疗组之间存在差异，这表明访谈的激励作用在该人群中可能比干预措施的效果更强。
