• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

策略出了什么问题?

What's wrong with strategy?

作者信息

Campbell A, Alexander M

机构信息

Ashridge Strategic Management Centre, London.

出版信息

Harv Bus Rev. 1997 Nov-Dec;75(6):42-51.

PMID:10174797
Abstract

Why is it that successful strategies are rarely developed as a result of formal planning processes? What is wrong with the way most companies go about developing strategy? Andrew Campbell and Marcus Alexander take a common sense look at why the planning frameworks managers use so often yield disappointing results. Companies often fail to distinguish between purpose (what an organization exists to do) and constraints (what an organization must do in order to survive), the authors say. Many executives mistakenly believe, for example, that satisfying stakeholders is an objective that drives thinking about strategy. In fact, it's a constraint, not an objective. Companies that don't win the loyalty of stakeholders will go out of business. Strategy is not about plans but about insights, the authors add. Strategy development is the process of discovering and understanding insights and should not be confused with planning, which is about turning insights into action. Furthermore, because executives develop most of their insights while actually doing the real work of running a business, it is important for companies not to separate strategy development from implementation. Is there a better way? The answer is not new planning processes or more effort. Instead, managers must understand two fundamental points: the benefit of having a well-articulated, stable purpose and the importance of discovering, understanding, documenting, and exploiting insights about how to create value.

摘要

为什么成功的战略很少是正式规划流程的结果?大多数公司制定战略的方式存在什么问题?安德鲁·坎贝尔和马库斯·亚历山大从常识角度审视了为何管理者经常使用的规划框架往往产生令人失望的结果。作者称,公司常常未能区分目的(组织存在的意义)和约束条件(组织为求生存必须做的事)。例如,许多高管错误地认为,满足利益相关者是推动战略思考的目标。事实上,这是一种约束条件,而非目标。无法赢得利益相关者忠诚的公司将会倒闭。作者补充道,战略不是关于计划,而是关于洞察力。战略制定是发现和理解洞察力的过程,不应与将洞察力转化为行动的规划相混淆。此外,由于高管们大多是在实际经营业务的过程中形成他们的洞察力,所以对公司来说,不将战略制定与实施相分离很重要。有没有更好的方法?答案不是新的规划流程或更多努力。相反,管理者必须理解两个基本要点:明确阐述且稳定的目标所带来的益处,以及发现、理解、记录和利用有关如何创造价值的洞察力的重要性。

相似文献

1
What's wrong with strategy?策略出了什么问题?
Harv Bus Rev. 1997 Nov-Dec;75(6):42-51.
2
Strategy under uncertainty.不确定性下的策略
Harv Bus Rev. 1997 Nov-Dec;75(6):66-79.
3
Tailored, not benchmarked. A fresh look at corporate planning.量身定制,而非对标。对企业规划的全新审视。
Harv Bus Rev. 1999 Mar-Apr;77(2):41-8, 50, 189.
4
Disruptive change. When trying harder is part of the problem.颠覆性变革。当越努力却越成为问题的一部分时。
Harv Bus Rev. 2002 May;80(5):94-101, 134.
5
Making strategy: learning by doing.制定策略:边做边学。
Harv Bus Rev. 1997 Nov-Dec;75(6):141-6, 148-56.
6
The ambidextrous organization.兼具两种能力的组织。
Harv Bus Rev. 2004 Apr;82(4):74-81, 140.
7
Manage customer-centric innovation--systematically.系统地管理以客户为中心的创新。
Harv Bus Rev. 2006 Apr;84(4):108-16; 149.
8
Strategy as revolution.作为革命的战略。
Harv Bus Rev. 1996 Jul-Aug;74(4):69-82.
9
Mapping your innovation strategy.规划你的创新战略。
Harv Bus Rev. 2006 May;84(5):104-13, 157.
10
Value innovation: the strategic logic of high growth.价值创新:高增长的战略逻辑。
Harv Bus Rev. 1997 Jan-Feb;75(1):102-12.