Bauters T G, Peleman R, Moerman M, Vermeersch H, de Looze D, Noens L, Nelis H J
Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, University of Ghent, University Hospital of Ghent, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 May;37(5):1498-502. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.5.1498-1502.1999.
A rapid enzymatic two-step test for the presumptive differentiation of four Candida species commonly occurring in various clinical samples is described. The technique involves membrane filtration of a liquid sample, followed by preincubation of the membrane filter on Sabouraud glucose agar supplemented with ticarcillin-clavulanic acid to yield microcolonies. In a separate assay step, parts of the filter are placed on absorbent pads impregnated with fluorogenic 4-methylumbelliferyl (4-MU) enzyme substrates (4-MU-N-acetyl-beta-D-galactosaminide, 4-MU-phosphate, 4-MU-pyrophosphate, and 4-MU-beta-D-galactoside) in combination with 0.1% digitonin acting as a membrane permeabilizer. The membrane filter in contact with the assay medium is incubated to allow cleavage of the enzyme substrate, resulting in fluorescent microcolonies under long-wavelength UV light. This approach, tested on 301 clinical samples, is able to presumptively differentiate C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. krusei, and C. tropicalis and to distinguish them from other Candida spp. in about 9 to 11 h. Overall agreement with the conventional methods of 94.4% (one Candida species present in the sample) to 83.8% (multiple Candida spp. present) was obtained. The false-negative rates with reference to identification by traditional methods were 1.3% (single species) and 3.8% (multiple species).
本文描述了一种快速酶促两步试验,用于对各种临床样本中常见的四种念珠菌进行初步鉴别。该技术包括对液体样本进行膜过滤,然后将膜滤器在补充有替卡西林 - 克拉维酸的沙氏葡萄糖琼脂上预孵育以产生微菌落。在单独的检测步骤中,将滤器的部分放置在浸渍有荧光4 - 甲基伞形酮(4 - MU)酶底物(4 - MU - N - 乙酰 - β - D - 半乳糖胺、4 - MU - 磷酸、4 - MU - 焦磷酸和4 - MU - β - D - 半乳糖苷)与作为膜通透剂的0.1%洋地黄皂苷的吸水垫上。将与检测培养基接触的膜滤器进行孵育,以使酶底物裂解,在长波长紫外光下产生荧光微菌落。这种方法在301份临床样本上进行了测试,能够在约9至11小时内初步鉴别白色念珠菌、光滑念珠菌、克柔念珠菌和热带念珠菌,并将它们与其他念珠菌属区分开来。与传统方法的总体一致性为94.4%(样本中存在一种念珠菌)至83.8%(样本中存在多种念珠菌)。相对于传统方法鉴定的假阴性率为1.3%(单一菌种)和3.8%(多种菌种)。