Agra Y, Badía X
Unidad de Investigación de Atención Primaria, Area 4 Insalud, Madrid.
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 1999 Jan-Feb;73(1):35-44.
In this work the validation of the Spanish version of the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL) to assess quality of life in cancer patients has been approached. The main goal of this study is to evaluate the psychometric properties of the questionnaire and its equivalence with the original English questionnaire.
The questionnaire was administered to a sample of 162 terminal cancer patients and 59 cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. The internal structure, was evaluated through a confirmatory factor analysis in TCP, the discriminatory power according to clinical situation of cancer patients, the internal consistency in both samples and the responsiveness to the changes over time after chemotherapy treatment was evaluated in PQT.
The internal structure of scales was similar in TCP to the original version. The cancer patients showed worse scores than the PQT. The reliability was > or = 0.70 for the scales and > or = 0.50 for the subscales except chemotherapy subscale. The scores of the scales were different (p < 0.05) before and after treatment, except for the psychological scale.
These results confirm the usefulness of the spanish version of the RSCL as a subjective measure of well-being in cancer patients.
在本研究中,对用于评估癌症患者生活质量的西班牙文版鹿特丹症状清单(RSCL)进行了验证。本研究的主要目的是评估该问卷的心理测量特性及其与原始英文问卷的等效性。
对162名晚期癌症患者和59名接受化疗的癌症患者样本进行了问卷调查。通过在TCP中进行验证性因素分析来评估内部结构,根据癌症患者的临床情况评估区分能力,在两个样本中评估内部一致性,并在PQT中评估化疗治疗后随时间变化的反应性。
TCP中量表的内部结构与原始版本相似。癌症患者的得分比PQT差。除化疗子量表外,量表的信度≥0.70,子量表的信度≥0.50。除心理量表外,治疗前后量表得分不同(p<0.05)。
这些结果证实了西班牙文版RSCL作为癌症患者幸福感主观测量工具的有用性。