1 Primary Care NHS , Valencia, Spain .
J Palliat Med. 2013 Oct;16(10):1188-96. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0005. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
Primary care physicians (PCPs) have a major responsibility in the management of palliative patients. Online palliative care (PC) education has not been shown to have a clinical impact on patients that is equal or different to traditional training.
This study tested the clinical effectiveness of online PC education of physicians through impact on symptom control, quality of life (QOL), caregiver satisfaction, and knowledge-attitude of physicians at 18 months of the intervention.
We conducted a randomized clinical trial. Subjects were 169 physicians randomly assigned to receive the online model or traditional training. Consecutive patients with advanced cancer requiring PC were included. Physicians and patients completed the Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS), and patients the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL) twice, 7 to 10 days apart. Caregivers completed the SERVQUAL. Physicians' level of knowledge-attitude was measured at 18 months.
Sixty-seven physicians enrolled 117 patients. The intervention group had reduced scores for pain, symptoms, and family anxiety. The global RSCL scale showed a difference between groups. There was no significant difference in the questionnaires used. Caregiver satisfaction was comparable between groups. Physicians in the intervention group significantly increased their knowledge without any differences in attitude. Online training was completed by 86.6% in the intervention group, whereas 13.4% in the control group accessed traditional training.
Participation in an online PC education program by PCPs improved patient scores for some symptoms and family anxiety on the POS and also showed improved global QOL. Significant differences were found in physicians' knowledge at short and long term.
初级保健医生(PCP)在姑息治疗患者的管理中负有主要责任。在线姑息治疗(PC)教育并未显示出对患者的临床影响与传统培训相等或不同。
本研究通过对症状控制、生活质量(QOL)、护理人员满意度和医生知识-态度的影响,测试了医生在线 PC 教育的临床效果,干预后 18 个月。
我们进行了一项随机临床试验。受试者为 169 名随机分配接受在线模型或传统培训的医生。纳入需要 PC 的晚期癌症连续患者。医生和患者两次填写姑息治疗结果量表(POS),患者在 7 到 10 天之间两次填写简短疼痛量表(BPI)和鹿特丹症状清单(RSCL)。护理人员完成 SERVQUAL。医生的知识-态度水平在 18 个月时进行测量。
67 名医生招募了 117 名患者。干预组疼痛、症状和家庭焦虑评分降低。RSCL 量表的全球评分显示出组间差异。使用的问卷没有显著差异。护理人员满意度两组相当。干预组医生的知识显著增加,而态度没有差异。干预组 86.6%的医生完成了在线 PC 教育,而对照组只有 13.4%的医生接受了传统培训。
PCP 参与在线 PC 教育计划可改善 POS 患者的某些症状和家庭焦虑评分,并显示出改善的总体 QOL。在短期和长期内,医生的知识都存在显著差异。