Singer M, Stopka T, Siano C, Springer K, Barton G, Khoshnood K, Gorry de Puga A, Heimer R
Hispanic Health Council, Hartford, Conn. 06106, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2000 Jul;90(7):1049-56. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.7.1049.
While significant gains have been achieved in understanding and reducing AIDS and hepatitis risks among injection drug users (IDUs), it is necessary to move beyond individual-level characteristics to gain a fuller understanding of the impact of social context on risk. In this study, 6 qualitative methods were used in combination with more traditional epidemiologic survey approaches and laboratory bioassay procedures to examine neighborhood differences in access to sterile syringes among IDUs in 3 northeastern cities. These methods consisted of (1) neighborhood-based IDU focus groups to construct social maps of local equipment acquisition and drug use sites; (2) ethnographic descriptions of target neighborhoods; (3) IDU diary keeping on drug use and injection equipment acquisition; (4) ethnographic day visits with IDUs in natural settings; (5) interviews with IDUs about syringe acquisition and collection of syringes for laboratory analysis; and (6) focused field observation and processual interviewing during drug injection. Preliminary findings from each of these methods are reported to illustrate the methods' value in elucidating the impact of local and regional social factors on sterile syringe access.
虽然在了解和降低注射吸毒者(IDU)感染艾滋病和肝炎风险方面已取得显著进展,但有必要超越个体层面的特征,以便更全面地了解社会环境对风险的影响。在本研究中,六种定性方法与更传统的流行病学调查方法及实验室生物测定程序相结合,以考察东北部三个城市注射吸毒者获取无菌注射器的社区差异。这些方法包括:(1)以社区为基础的注射吸毒者焦点小组,绘制当地设备获取和吸毒地点的社会地图;(2)对目标社区的人种志描述;(3)注射吸毒者记录吸毒和注射设备获取情况的日记;()在自然环境中对注射吸毒者进行人种志日间探访;(5)就注射器获取情况对注射吸毒者进行访谈,并收集注射器用于实验室分析;以及(6)在吸毒注射期间进行重点实地观察和过程访谈。报告了这些方法各自的初步结果,以说明这些方法在阐明当地和区域社会因素对无菌注射器获取的影响方面的价值。