• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Driver air bag effectiveness by severity of the crash.按碰撞严重程度划分的驾驶员安全气囊有效性
Am J Public Health. 2000 Oct;90(10):1575-81. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.10.1575.
2
Effects of child age and body size on serious injury from passenger air-bag presence in motor vehicle crashes.儿童年龄和体型对机动车碰撞事故中乘客安全气囊导致严重伤害的影响。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):1579-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0555.
3
Injury and side impact air bag deployment in near and far sided motor vehicle crashes, United States, 2000-2005.2000 - 2005年美国近侧和远侧机动车碰撞事故中的伤害与侧面碰撞安全气囊展开情况
J Trauma. 2008 Dec;65(6):1333-8; discussion 1338-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31818cac13.
4
Real-world injury patterns associated with Hybrid III sternal deflections in frontal crash tests.真实世界中与 Hybrid III 胸骨挠度相关的正面碰撞试验中的损伤模式。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(8):807-15. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.766825.
5
The effectiveness of air bags.安全气囊的有效性。
Accid Anal Prev. 1999 Nov;31(6):781-7. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00041-x.
6
The effect of frontal air bags on eye injury patterns in automobile crashes.正面安全气囊对汽车碰撞中眼部损伤模式的影响。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Nov;120(11):1517-22. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.11.1517.
7
Factors influencing pediatric Injury Severity Score and Glasgow Coma Scale in pediatric automobile crashes: results from the Crash Injury Research Engineering Network.影响儿童汽车碰撞事故中儿童损伤严重度评分和格拉斯哥昏迷量表的因素:碰撞损伤研究工程网络的结果
J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Nov;41(11):1854-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.06.012.
8
Crash scene photography in motor vehicle crashes without air bag deployment.未展开安全气囊的机动车碰撞事故中的事故现场摄影。
Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Sep;9(9):924-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb02194.x.
9
Automobile driver fatalities in frontal impacts: air bags compared with manual belts.正面碰撞中汽车驾驶员的死亡情况:安全气囊与安全带的比较。
Am J Public Health. 1993 May;83(5):661-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.5.661.
10
An overview of frontal air bag performance with changes in frontal crash-test requirements: findings of the Blue Ribbon Panel for the evaluation of advanced technology air bags.随着正面碰撞测试要求的变化对正面安全气囊性能的概述:先进技术安全气囊评估蓝带小组的研究结果
Traffic Inj Prev. 2008 Oct;9(5):421-31. doi: 10.1080/15389580802046250.

引用本文的文献

1
Toxic External Exposure Leading to Ocular Surface Injury.有毒外部暴露导致眼表损伤。
Vision (Basel). 2023 Apr 3;7(2):32. doi: 10.3390/vision7020032.
2
Exploring Influential Factors Affecting the Severity of Urban Expressway Collisions: A Study Based on Collision Data.探讨影响城市快速路碰撞严重程度的因素:基于碰撞数据的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 8;19(14):8362. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148362.
3
Pay or prevent? Human safety, costs to society and legal perspectives on animal-vehicle collisions in São Paulo state, Brazil.付费还是预防?巴西圣保罗州动物与车辆碰撞的人类安全、社会成本和法律观点
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 11;14(4):e0215152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215152. eCollection 2019.
4
Will Automated Driving Technologies Make Today's Effective Restraint Systems Obsolete?自动驾驶技术会使当今有效的约束系统过时吗?
Am J Public Health. 2017 Oct;107(10):1590-1592. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304009.
5
The effect of driver age on the incidence and severity of upper extremity injuries due to second generation front air bag deployment.驾驶员年龄对第二代前排安全气囊展开所致上肢损伤发生率及严重程度的影响。
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2010;54:215-22.
6
Head CT evaluation in clinically stable motor vehicle collision patients.对临床状况稳定的机动车碰撞伤患者进行头部CT评估。
Emerg Radiol. 2005 Nov;11(6):328-35. doi: 10.1007/s10140-005-0419-y. Epub 2005 Jul 26.
7
Causes and outcomes of mild traumatic brain injury: an analysis of CIREN data.轻度创伤性脑损伤的病因与转归:基于CIREN数据的分析
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2003;47:577-89.

本文引用的文献

1
The effectiveness of air bags.安全气囊的有效性。
Accid Anal Prev. 1999 Nov;31(6):781-7. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00041-x.
2
The cost-effectiveness of air bags by seating position.按座位位置划分的安全气囊成本效益
JAMA. 1997 Nov 5;278(17):1418-25.
3
The development of the Functional Capacity Index.功能能力指数的发展。
J Trauma. 1996 Nov;41(5):799-807. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199611000-00006.
4
Traumatic aortic valve injury sustained despite the deployment of an automobile air bag.尽管使用了汽车安全气囊,仍发生了创伤性主动脉瓣损伤。
Chest. 1993 May;103(5):1603. doi: 10.1378/chest.103.5.1603.
5
Automobile driver fatalities in frontal impacts: air bags compared with manual belts.正面碰撞中汽车驾驶员的死亡情况:安全气囊与安全带的比较。
Am J Public Health. 1993 May;83(5):661-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.5.661.
6
Research in biomechanics of occupant protection.乘员保护生物力学研究。
J Trauma. 1995 Apr;38(4):570-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199504000-00017.
7
Airbag deployments: the Canadian experience.安全气囊的部署:加拿大的经验
J Trauma. 1995 Apr;38(4):476-81. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199504000-00002.
8
Double pair comparison--a new method to determine how occupant characteristics affect fatality risk in traffic crashes.双配对比较——一种确定驾乘人员特征如何影响交通事故中死亡风险的新方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 1986 Jun;18(3):217-27. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(86)90006-0.
9
Safety belt injury reduction related to crash severity and front seated position.与碰撞严重程度和前排座位位置相关的安全带伤害减少情况。
J Trauma. 1987 Jul;27(7):733-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198707000-00007.
10
Risk of fatality from physical trauma versus sex and age.身体创伤导致的死亡风险与性别和年龄的关系。
J Trauma. 1988 Mar;28(3):368-78. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198803000-00013.

按碰撞严重程度划分的驾驶员安全气囊有效性

Driver air bag effectiveness by severity of the crash.

作者信息

Segui-Gomez M

机构信息

Risk Analysis and Injury Control and Research Center, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass., USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2000 Oct;90(10):1575-81. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.10.1575.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.90.10.1575
PMID:11029991
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1446367/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This analysis provided effectiveness estimates of the driver-side air bag while controlling for severity of the crash and other potential confounders.

METHODS

Data were from the National Automotive Sampling System (1993-1996). Injury severity was described on the basis of the Abbreviated Injury Scale, Injury Severity Score, Functional Capacity Index, and survival. Ordinal, linear, and logistic multivariate regression methods were used.

RESULTS

Air bag deployment in frontal or near-frontal crashes decreases the probability of having severe and fatal injuries (e.g., Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 4-6), including those causing a long-lasting high degree of functional limitation. However, air bag deployment in low-severity crashes increases the probability that a driver (particularly a woman) will sustain injuries of Abbreviated Injury Scale level 1 to 3. Air bag deployment exerts a net injurious effect in low-severity crashes and a net protective effect in high-severity crashes. The level of crash severity at which air bags are protective is higher for female than for male drivers.

CONCLUSIONS

Air bag improvement should minimize the injuries induced by their deployment. One possibility is to raise their deployment level so that they deploy only in more severe crashes.

摘要

目的

本分析在控制碰撞严重程度和其他潜在混杂因素的同时,提供了驾驶员侧安全气囊的有效性估计。

方法

数据来自国家汽车抽样系统(1993 - 1996年)。损伤严重程度根据简略损伤量表、损伤严重度评分、功能能力指数和生存率进行描述。使用了有序、线性和逻辑多元回归方法。

结果

在正面或接近正面碰撞中展开安全气囊可降低遭受严重和致命损伤(例如简略损伤量表评分为4 - 6分)的概率,包括那些导致长期高度功能受限的损伤。然而,在低严重度碰撞中展开安全气囊会增加驾驶员(尤其是女性)遭受简略损伤量表1至3级损伤的概率。安全气囊展开在低严重度碰撞中产生净伤害效应,在高严重度碰撞中产生净保护效应。安全气囊具有保护作用的碰撞严重程度水平,女性驾驶员高于男性驾驶员。

结论

安全气囊的改进应尽量减少其展开所导致的损伤。一种可能性是提高其展开水平,使其仅在更严重的碰撞中展开。