Rockwood K, Hogan D B, MacKnight C
Division of Geriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Drugs Aging. 2000 Oct;17(4):295-302. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200017040-00005.
The use of the term 'frailty' has shown tremendous growth in the last 15 years, but this has not been accompanied by a widely accepted definition, let alone agreed-upon measures. In this paper, we review approaches to the definition and measurement of frailty and discuss the relationship between frailty, aging and disability. Two trends are evident in definitions, which often trade off comprehensiveness for precision: frailty can be seen as being synonymous with a single-system problem or as a multisystem problem. The essential feature of frailty is the notion of risk due to instability (itself suggesting a balance of many factors), and has been only poorly measured to date. Future models of frailty should incorporate more precise operationalisation of the probability of frailty and better explain the relationship between disease, disability and frailty.
在过去15年里,“衰弱”一词的使用显著增加,但却没有一个被广泛接受的定义,更不用说公认的衡量标准了。在本文中,我们回顾了衰弱的定义和测量方法,并讨论了衰弱、衰老和残疾之间的关系。定义中有两个明显的趋势,它们常常在全面性和精确性之间权衡:衰弱可以被视为与单一系统问题同义,也可以被视为多系统问题。衰弱的本质特征是由于不稳定性导致的风险概念(不稳定性本身意味着多种因素的平衡),而迄今为止对其测量得还很不完善。未来的衰弱模型应该更精确地对衰弱概率进行操作化,并更好地解释疾病与残疾和衰弱之间的关系。