Woodcock A, White P, Smith H, Coles C, Campion-Smith C, Stannard T
Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London.
Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Oct;50(459):785-90.
The Department of Health's review of continuing professional development in general practice advocates setting team and individual goals.
To explore how general practitioners (GPs) share learning experiences with colleagues, focusing on how GPs choose courses as one factor influencing sharing.
Interviews were conducted with 21 GPs using grounded theory methodology. The responses were coded by six researchers from psychology, education, and general practice.
Much sharing with colleagues took place, though not always immediately following a course. GP explanations revealed four reasons for course selection that influenced the degree of sharing: 1. Attendance to meet group needs encouraged rapid sharing and could involve course attendance with colleagues. 2. Attendance to enhance 'special interests' could either encourage or inhibit sharing. 3. Attendance in pursuit of 'personal interests' peripheral to general practice did not result in sharing within the primary care team. 4. Attendance to meet personal learning needs did not involve sharing when needs were not currently shared with colleagues.
Course selection and subsequent sharing have implications for course providers and those writing personal and practice professional development plans.
卫生部对全科医疗持续专业发展的审查提倡设定团队和个人目标。
探讨全科医生(GP)如何与同事分享学习经验,重点关注全科医生如何选择课程作为影响分享的一个因素。
采用扎根理论方法对21名全科医生进行访谈。六位来自心理学、教育学和全科医疗领域的研究人员对访谈回复进行编码。
与同事的分享很常见,不过并不总是在课程结束后立即进行。全科医生的解释揭示了影响分享程度的四个课程选择原因:1. 为满足团队需求而参加课程会促使迅速分享,可能涉及与同事一同参加课程。2. 为提升“特殊兴趣”而参加课程可能会促进或抑制分享。3. 为追求全科医疗之外的“个人兴趣”而参加课程不会在初级保健团队内部引发分享。4. 为满足个人学习需求而参加课程,若需求当前未与同事共享,则不会涉及分享。
课程选择及后续分享对课程提供者以及撰写个人和实践专业发展计划的人员具有启示意义。