Suppr超能文献

全科医生对研究生教育课程的选择会对同事产生影响:给课程提供者以及撰写实践专业发展计划者的启示。

GP selection of postgraduate education courses has implications for colleagues: messages for course providers and for those writing practice professional development plans.

作者信息

Woodcock A, White P, Smith H, Coles C, Campion-Smith C, Stannard T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Oct;50(459):785-90.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Department of Health's review of continuing professional development in general practice advocates setting team and individual goals.

AIM

To explore how general practitioners (GPs) share learning experiences with colleagues, focusing on how GPs choose courses as one factor influencing sharing.

METHOD

Interviews were conducted with 21 GPs using grounded theory methodology. The responses were coded by six researchers from psychology, education, and general practice.

RESULTS

Much sharing with colleagues took place, though not always immediately following a course. GP explanations revealed four reasons for course selection that influenced the degree of sharing: 1. Attendance to meet group needs encouraged rapid sharing and could involve course attendance with colleagues. 2. Attendance to enhance 'special interests' could either encourage or inhibit sharing. 3. Attendance in pursuit of 'personal interests' peripheral to general practice did not result in sharing within the primary care team. 4. Attendance to meet personal learning needs did not involve sharing when needs were not currently shared with colleagues.

CONCLUSION

Course selection and subsequent sharing have implications for course providers and those writing personal and practice professional development plans.

摘要

背景

卫生部对全科医疗持续专业发展的审查提倡设定团队和个人目标。

目的

探讨全科医生(GP)如何与同事分享学习经验,重点关注全科医生如何选择课程作为影响分享的一个因素。

方法

采用扎根理论方法对21名全科医生进行访谈。六位来自心理学、教育学和全科医疗领域的研究人员对访谈回复进行编码。

结果

与同事的分享很常见,不过并不总是在课程结束后立即进行。全科医生的解释揭示了影响分享程度的四个课程选择原因:1. 为满足团队需求而参加课程会促使迅速分享,可能涉及与同事一同参加课程。2. 为提升“特殊兴趣”而参加课程可能会促进或抑制分享。3. 为追求全科医疗之外的“个人兴趣”而参加课程不会在初级保健团队内部引发分享。4. 为满足个人学习需求而参加课程,若需求当前未与同事共享,则不会涉及分享。

结论

课程选择及后续分享对课程提供者以及撰写个人和实践专业发展计划的人员具有启示意义。

相似文献

5
[Practice is learned by practice].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1998 Aug 20;118(19):2975-8.
6
The impact of course attendance on the practice of dentists.课程出勤对牙医执业的影响。
Br Dent J. 2004 Jun 26;196(12):773-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4811391.
9
[How does professional competence develop?].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1998 Aug 20;118(19):2979-81.

本文引用的文献

4
Finance, not learning needs, makes general practitioners attend courses: a database survey.
BMJ. 1997 Aug 9;315(7104):353. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7104.353.
5
Educating doctors, to improve patient care.培养医生,以改善患者护理。
BMJ. 1997 Aug 9;315(7104):326. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7104.326.
10
Informal advice- and information-seeking between physicians.医生之间非正式的建议与信息寻求。
J Med Educ. 1981 Mar;56(3):174-80. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198103000-00003.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验