• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲患者对全科医疗服务的评价:一项国际比较。

Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison.

作者信息

Grol R, Wensing M, Mainz J, Jung H P, Ferreira P, Hearnshaw H, Hjortdahl P, Olesen F, Reis S, Ribacke M, Szecsenyi J

机构信息

University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Nov;50(460):882-7.

PMID:11141874
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1313852/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients' evaluations can be used to improve health care and compare general practice in different health systems.

AIM

To identify aspects of general practice that are generally evaluated positively by patients and to compare opinions of patients in different European countries on actual care provision.

METHOD

An internationally-validated questionnaire was distributed to and completed by patients in 10 European countries. A stratified sample of 36 practices per country, with at least 1080 patients per country, was included. A set of 23 validated questions on evaluations of different aspects of care was used, as well as questions on age, sex, overall health status, and frequency of visiting the GP.

RESULTS

The patient sample included 17,391 patients in 10 different countries; the average response rate was 79% (range = 67% to 89%). In general, patients visiting their general practitioner (GP) were very positive about the care provided. For most of the 23 selected aspects of care more than 80% viewed care as good or excellent; in particular, keeping records confidential, GP listening to patients, time during consultations, and quick services in case of urgent problems were evaluated positively. Patients were relatively negative about organisational aspects of care. The evaluations in different countries were largely similar, with some interesting differences; for instance, service and organisational aspects were evaluated more positively in fee-for-service health systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in Europe are positive about general practice but improvements in practice management in some countries are requested. More research is needed to study the complex field of differences in expectations and evaluations between countries with different health systems.

摘要

背景

患者评价可用于改善医疗保健并比较不同卫生系统中的全科医疗。

目的

确定患者普遍给予积极评价的全科医疗方面,并比较不同欧洲国家患者对实际医疗服务提供的看法。

方法

向10个欧洲国家的患者发放并由其完成一份经过国际验证的问卷。每个国家纳入36个医疗机构的分层样本,每个国家至少有1080名患者。使用了一组关于医疗不同方面评价的23个经过验证的问题,以及关于年龄、性别、总体健康状况和看全科医生频率的问题。

结果

患者样本包括来自10个不同国家的17391名患者;平均回复率为79%(范围 = 67%至89%)。总体而言,看全科医生的患者对所提供的医疗服务非常满意。在所选的23个医疗方面中,大多数方面超过80%的患者认为医疗服务良好或优秀;特别是,保密记录、全科医生倾听患者意见、会诊时间以及紧急情况下的快速服务得到了积极评价。患者对医疗的组织方面评价相对较低。不同国家的评价在很大程度上相似,但也存在一些有趣的差异;例如,在按服务收费的卫生系统中,对服务和组织方面的评价更为积极。

结论

欧洲患者对全科医疗持积极态度,但一些国家要求改善医疗管理。需要更多研究来探讨不同卫生系统国家之间期望和评价差异的复杂领域。

相似文献

1
Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison.欧洲患者对全科医疗服务的评价:一项国际比较。
Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Nov;50(460):882-7.
2
[How do patients evaluate their general practitioners? Danish results from a European study].[患者如何评价他们的全科医生?一项欧洲研究的丹麦结果]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2000 Jan 31;162(5):654-8.
3
Impact of national health care systems on patient evaluations of general practice in Europe.欧洲国家医疗保健系统对患者对全科医疗评价的影响。
Health Policy. 2004 Jun;68(3):353-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.10.010.
4
Consultations in general practice and at an Aboriginal community controlled health service: do they differ?在全科医疗和原住民社区控制的健康服务机构中的会诊:它们有差异吗?
Rural Remote Health. 2006 Jul-Sep;6(3):560. Epub 2006 Jul 19.
5
[What do patients expect from the general practitioner? Danish results from a European study].[患者对全科医生有何期望?一项欧洲研究的丹麦结果]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1998 Aug 17;160(34):4876-81.
6
['Consumer quality'-index 'General practice care' measures patients' experiences and compares general practices with each other].“消费者质量”指数“全科医疗护理”衡量患者的体验,并对各全科医疗进行相互比较。
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2009;153:A180.
7
Direct access in primary care and patient satisfaction: a European study.初级保健中的直接问诊与患者满意度:一项欧洲研究。
Health Policy. 2006 Mar;76(1):72-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.05.003. Epub 2005 Jul 1.
8
Comparison of patient evaluations of health care quality in relation to WHO measures of achievement in 12 European countries.12个欧洲国家患者对医疗保健质量的评价与世界卫生组织成就衡量标准的比较。
Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Feb;82(2):106-14. Epub 2004 Mar 16.
9
An evaluation of a GP out-of-hours service: meeting patient expectations of care.对全科医生非工作时间服务的评估:满足患者对医疗护理的期望。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 Aug;10(3):467-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2004.00446.x.
10
Improvement in the accessibility and organization of services of family physicians in a small town in Poland: a comparison of patient opinions between 1998 and 2002.波兰一个小镇家庭医生服务的可及性与组织状况的改善:1998年与2002年患者意见比较
Adv Med Sci. 2006;51:226-31.

引用本文的文献

1
Service Quality Assessment of Digital Health Solutions in Outpatient Care: Qualitative Item Repository Development Study.门诊护理中数字健康解决方案的服务质量评估:定性项目库开发研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 24;9:e68276. doi: 10.2196/68276.
2
Resource-Oriented Case Management to Implement Recommendations for Patients With Chronic Pain and Frequent Use of Analgesics in General Practices (Project RELIEF): Protocol for a Single-Arm Exploratory Feasibility Study.以资源为导向的病例管理,用于在全科医疗中实施针对慢性疼痛和频繁使用镇痛药患者的建议(缓解项目):单臂探索性可行性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Apr 15;14:e66335. doi: 10.2196/66335.
3
Healthcare users' evaluations of general practice: a survey among Danish men aged 45-70 years.医疗保健用户对全科医疗的评价:一项针对45至70岁丹麦男性的调查。
BJGP Open. 2025 Jul 23;9(2). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0153. Print 2025.
4
Current Advances in Patient-Perceived Quality Assessment Within Romanian Healthcare.罗马尼亚医疗保健中患者感知质量评估的当前进展
Cureus. 2024 Sep 24;16(9):e70111. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70111. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
International cross-cultural development and field testing of the primary care practice questionnaire for the PaRIS survey (PaRIS-PCPQ).帕里思调查初级保健实践问卷(帕里思-PCPQ)的国际跨文化发展和现场测试。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 May 17;25(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02375-8.
6
Patient satisfaction of primary care services in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: A scoping review.海湾合作委员会国家初级保健服务的患者满意度:一项范围综述。
J Gen Fam Med. 2023 Jul 12;24(5):279-287. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.640. eCollection 2023 Sep.
7
'Good' and 'bad' doctors - a qualitative study of the Austrian public on the elements of professional medical identity.好医生和坏医生——奥地利公众对专业医疗身份要素的定性研究。
Med Educ Online. 2022 Dec;27(1):2114133. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2114133.
8
Attachment and patient activation as predictors of the interest and use of telemedical health applications -results of an observational study in primary health care.依恋和患者激活作为远程医疗健康应用的兴趣和使用的预测因素——初级保健中观察性研究的结果。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Apr 29;23(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01711-0.
9
The Role of General Practice in Complex Health Care Systems.全科医疗在复杂医疗体系中的作用。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 25;8:680695. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.680695. eCollection 2021.
10
Patient experiences with general practitioners: psychometric performance of the generic PEQ-GP instrument among patients with chronic conditions.患者对全科医生的体验:慢性病患者通用 PEQ-GP 工具的心理计量学性能。
Fam Pract. 2022 May 28;39(3):519-526. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab133.

本文引用的文献

1
General practice care and patients' priorities in Europe: an international comparison.欧洲的全科医疗护理与患者优先事项:一项国际比较
Health Policy. 1998 Sep;45(3):175-86. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(98)00040-2.
2
Patients' priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison. European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice (EUROPEP).患者对全科医疗服务的优先需求:一项国际比较。欧洲全科医疗患者评估特别工作组(EUROPEP)。
Fam Pract. 1999 Feb;16(1):4-11. doi: 10.1093/fampra/16.1.4.
3
Assessment of management in general practice: validation of a practice visit method.全科医疗管理评估:一种诊疗访问方法的验证
Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Nov;48(436):1743-50.
4
Patients' priorities.患者的优先事项。
BMJ. 1999 Jan 30;318(7179):277. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7179.277.
5
The NHS: possibilities for the endgame. Think more about reducing expectations.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS):终局的可能性。更多地考虑降低期望。
BMJ. 1999 Jan 23;318(7178):209-10. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7178.209.
6
A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. Part 1: Description of the research domain.关于全科医疗中患者优先事项的文献系统评价。第1部分:研究领域描述。
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Nov;47(10):1573-88. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00222-6.
7
What makes a good general practitioner: do patients and doctors have different views?怎样成为一名优秀的全科医生:患者和医生的看法是否不同?
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Dec;47(425):805-9.
8
Partnership with patients.与患者的合作关系。
BMJ. 1998 Jan 10;316(7125):85-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7125.85.
9
Prescribing behaviour in clinical practice: patients' expectations and doctors' perceptions of patients' expectations--a questionnaire study.临床实践中的处方行为:患者期望与医生对患者期望的认知——一项问卷调查研究
BMJ. 1997 Aug 30;315(7107):520-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7107.520.
10
Service profiles of general practitioners in Europe. European GP Task Profile Study.欧洲全科医生的服务概况。欧洲全科医生任务概况研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Aug;47(421):481-6.