Keiser K, Johnson C C, Tipton D A
Department of Biologic and Diagnostic Sciences, Division of Endodontics, University of Tennessee College of Dentistry, 875 Union Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.
J Endod. 2000 May;26(5):288-91. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200005000-00010.
The purpose of the present study was to compare the cytotoxicity of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) to other commonly used retrofilling materials, Super-EBA and amalgam. This was accomplished using a cell viability assay for mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity in human periodontal ligament fibroblasts after 24-hr exposure to extracts of varying concentrations of the test materials, in both freshly mixed and 24-hr set states. Methyl methacrylate 2% (vol/vol) served as the positive control, and complete culture medium served as the negative control. Differences in mean cell viability values were assessed by ANOVA (p < 0.05). In the freshly mixed state, the sequence of toxicity was amalgam > Super-EBA > MTA. In the 24-hr set state the sequence of toxicity at a low extract concentration was Super-EBA > MTA, amalgam, and Super-EBA > amalgam > MTA at a higher extract concentration. This study supports the use of MTA in the root-end environment.
本研究的目的是比较三氧化矿物凝聚体(MTA)与其他常用的根尖倒充填材料——超级EBA和汞合金的细胞毒性。这是通过在人牙周膜成纤维细胞中,对不同浓度的测试材料提取物进行24小时暴露后,使用细胞活力测定法检测线粒体脱氢酶活性来完成的,测试材料包括新鲜混合状态和24小时凝固状态。2%(体积/体积)的甲基丙烯酸甲酯作为阳性对照,完全培养基作为阴性对照。通过方差分析评估平均细胞活力值的差异(p < 0.05)。在新鲜混合状态下,毒性顺序为汞合金>超级EBA>MTA。在24小时凝固状态下,低提取物浓度时的毒性顺序为超级EBA>MTA、汞合金,高提取物浓度时为超级EBA>汞合金>MTA。本研究支持在根尖环境中使用MTA。