Hall W A, Callery P
University of British Columbia School of Nursing.
Qual Health Res. 2001 Mar;11(2):257-72. doi: 10.1177/104973201129119082.
Some proponents of the grounded theory method appear to treat interview and participant observation data as though they mirror informants' realities. Others claim that grounded theory incorporates reflexivity. It is claimed in this article that the principal texts on grounded theory do not attend to the effects of interactions between researchers and participants in interview and participant observation contexts. Descriptions of the effects of interactions on interview data and attention to relationships between interviewers and interviewees are necessary for attending to the rigor of grounded theory findings. Therefore, it is argued that reflexivity and relationality, which are defined as attending to the effects of researcher-participant interactions on the construction of data and to power and trust relationships between researchers and participants, should be incorporated into grounded theory.
一些扎根理论方法的支持者似乎将访谈和参与观察数据视为反映受访者现实的镜子。另一些人则声称扎根理论包含反思性。本文认为,关于扎根理论的主要文本并未关注研究人员与受访者在访谈和参与观察情境中的互动所产生的影响。对于扎根理论研究结果的严谨性而言,描述互动对访谈数据的影响以及关注访谈者与受访者之间的关系是必要的。因此,有人认为,反思性和关系性应纳入扎根理论,反思性和关系性被定义为关注研究人员与参与者的互动对数据构建的影响以及研究人员与参与者之间的权力和信任关系。