• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响家庭聚焦预防性干预研究入组的因素建模

Modeling factors influencing enrollment in family-focused preventive intervention research.

作者信息

Spoth R, Redmond C, Shin C

机构信息

Institute for Social and Behavioral Research, Iowa State University, Ames 50010, USA.

出版信息

Prev Sci. 2000 Dec;1(4):213-25. doi: 10.1023/a:1026551229118.

DOI:10.1023/a:1026551229118
PMID:11523749
Abstract

The reported study tests an extension of a previously supported model of family context and health belief predictors of parental inclination to enroll in preventive interventions. The extended model addresses limitations in the prior investigation; it examines the role of intervention-related beliefs and inclinations on actual enrollment in a skills training intervention research project. Model testing was conducted with a sample of 635 parents of 6th graders who completed a prospective participation factor survey and were recruited for an intervention research project 6 months later. The model fit was strong and all but one of the primary hypothesized effects were supported. Notably, both stated inclination to enroll in an intervention and in the research project had significant positive effects on actual project enrollment occurring 6 months later. Perceived intervention benefits and barriers had significant effects on both types of stated inclination to enroll. Examination of modification indices for the model suggested an additional path linking educational attainment with actual enrollment.

摘要

所报道的这项研究测试了一个先前得到支持的家庭环境模型及父母参与预防性干预倾向的健康信念预测因素的扩展模型。该扩展模型解决了先前调查中的局限性;它考察了与干预相关的信念和倾向在技能培训干预研究项目中对实际参与情况的作用。对635名六年级学生的家长进行了模型测试,这些家长完成了一项前瞻性参与因素调查,并在6个月后被招募参加一个干预研究项目。模型拟合度很强,除了一个主要假设效应外,其他所有效应都得到了支持。值得注意的是,表明参与干预和参与研究项目的倾向对6个月后实际参与项目都有显著的积极影响。感知到的干预益处和障碍对两种表明参与的倾向都有显著影响。对模型修正指数的检验表明,存在一条将教育程度与实际参与情况联系起来的额外路径。

相似文献

1
Modeling factors influencing enrollment in family-focused preventive intervention research.影响家庭聚焦预防性干预研究入组的因素建模
Prev Sci. 2000 Dec;1(4):213-25. doi: 10.1023/a:1026551229118.
2
A prospective validation study of inclination, belief, and context predictors of family-focused prevention involvement.
Fam Process. 1997 Dec;36(4):403-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1997.00403.x.
3
Understanding family motivations and barriers to participation in community-based programs for overweight youth: one program model does not fit all.了解超重青少年参与社区项目的家庭动机和障碍:一个项目模式并不适合所有人。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 Jul-Aug;19(4):E1-E10. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31825ceaf9.
4
The marketing plan and outcome indicators for recruiting and retaining parents in the HomeStyles randomized controlled trial.“家庭风格”随机对照试验中招募和留住家长的营销计划及成果指标。
Trials. 2017 Nov 15;18(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2262-3.
5
A family-based approach to the prevention of depressive symptoms in children at risk: evidence of parental and child change.一种基于家庭的方法预防有风险儿童的抑郁症状:父母和儿童变化的证据。
Pediatrics. 2003 Aug;112(2):e119-31. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.2.e119.
6
From concept to application: the impact of a community-wide intervention to improve the delivery of preventive services to children.从概念到应用:一项全社区干预措施对改善儿童预防性服务提供情况的影响。
Pediatrics. 2001 Sep;108(3):E42. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.3.e42.
7
Factors influencing enrollment in a cardiac rehabilitation exercise program.影响心脏康复运动项目参与率的因素。
Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2003;13(1):11-5.
8
Reliability and validity of an instrument to measure maternal health beliefs.一种测量孕产妇健康信念的工具的信度和效度。
Med Care. 1994 Aug;32(8):832-46. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199408000-00006.
9
Measuring participation in a prevention trial with parents of young children.衡量幼儿家长参与预防试验的情况。
Res Nurs Health. 2006 Jun;29(3):212-22. doi: 10.1002/nur.20127.
10
A health promotion intervention for families in a Medicaid managed care plan.一项针对医疗补助管理式医疗计划参保家庭的健康促进干预措施。
Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Aug;6(8):823-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb01215.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation Fidelity of a Virtual Adaptation of the Guiding Good Choices Program.《引导良好选择计划》虚拟改编版的实施保真度
J Community Psychol. 2025 Jul;53(5):e70020. doi: 10.1002/jcop.70020.
2
Enhancing engagement in parenting programs: A comparative study of in-person, online, and telehealth formats.提高参与育儿项目的程度:面对面、在线和远程医疗形式的比较研究。
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2024 Jul;162. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107686. Epub 2024 May 24.
3
Protective Effect of Parental Monitoring on Early-to-Mid Adolescents Displaying High-Level and Increasing Aggressive Behavior.

本文引用的文献

1
Effective recruitment of parents into family-focused prevention research: A comparison of two strategies.有效招募家长参与以家庭为中心的预防研究:两种策略的比较。
Psychol Health. 1994 Jul;9(5):353-370. doi: 10.1080/08870449408407494.
2
A neonatal preventive intervention study: Issues of recruitment and retention.
J Prim Prev. 1989 Mar;9(3):164-76. doi: 10.1007/BF01325210.
3
A home-based prevention program for sixth-grade alcohol use: Results from project Northland.一项针对六年级学生饮酒问题的家庭预防项目:北国项目的结果。
父母监督对表现出高水平且不断增加的攻击性行为的青少年中期早期阶段的保护作用。
Appl Dev Sci. 2024;28(3):375-390. doi: 10.1080/10888691.2023.2221437. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
4
A mixed methods evaluation of family-driven care implementation in juvenile justice agencies in Georgia.对佐治亚州青少年司法机构中家庭驱动式照护实施情况的混合方法评估。
Health Justice. 2024 Feb 26;12(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40352-024-00261-0.
5
A quasi-experimental effectiveness evaluation of the 'Incredible Years Toddler' parenting programme on children's development aged 5: A study protocol.“难以置信的岁月”幼儿养育计划对 5 岁儿童发展的准实验有效性评估:研究方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 27;18(9):e0291557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291557. eCollection 2023.
6
Protocol for the effectiveness evaluation of an antenatal, universally offered, and remotely delivered parenting programme 'Baby Steps' on maternal outcomes: a Born in Bradford's Better Start (BiBBS) study.《“婴儿起步”产前、普遍提供和远程育儿计划对产妇结局的有效性评估方案:布拉德福德出生的更好开端(BiBBS)研究》。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 28;23(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15111-1.
7
Condemn or Treat? The Influence of Adults' Stigmatizing Attitudes on Mental Health Service Use for Children.谴责还是治疗?成人污名化态度对儿童心理健康服务使用的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 30;19(23):15951. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315951.
8
Couple-Level Stress Proliferation and Husbands' and Wives' Distress During the Life Course.夫妻层面的压力扩散与夫妻在生命历程中的苦恼
J Marriage Fam. 2020 Jun;82(3):1041-1055. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12644. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
9
The Importance of Anti-Racism in Trauma-Informed Family Engagement.在创伤知情型家庭参与中反种族主义的重要性。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2022 Jan;49(1):125-138. doi: 10.1007/s10488-021-01147-1. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
10
Predictors of Attendance Patterns in a Universal Family-Based Preventive Intervention Program.预测普遍家庭为基础的预防干预计划的参与模式的因素。
J Prim Prev. 2021 Oct;42(5):409-424. doi: 10.1007/s10935-021-00636-1. Epub 2021 May 20.
J Prim Prev. 1995 Dec;16(2):125-47. doi: 10.1007/BF02407336.
4
Study of participation barriers in family-focused prevention: research issues and preliminary results.以家庭为中心的预防中的参与障碍研究:研究问题与初步结果
Int Q Community Health Educ. 1992 Jan 1;13(4):365-88. doi: 10.2190/69LM-59KD-K9CE-8Y8B.
5
Behavioral family interventions for improving child-rearing: a review of the literature for clinicians and policy makers.改善育儿方式的行为家庭干预:面向临床医生和政策制定者的文献综述
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 1998 Mar;1(1):41-60. doi: 10.1023/a:1021848315541.
6
Factors which explain amount of participation in rural adolescent alcohol use prevention task forces.解释农村青少年酒精使用预防特别工作组参与程度的因素。
Am J Health Promot. 1995 Jan-Feb;9(3):169-71. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-9.3.169.
7
Identifying program preferences through conjoint analysis: illustrative results from a parent sample.通过联合分析确定项目偏好:来自家长样本的说明性结果。
Am J Health Promot. 1993 Nov-Dec;8(2):124-33. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-8.2.124.
8
Consumer-focused data collection in prevention program evaluation. Rationale and illustrations.
Eval Health Prof. 1993 Sep;16(3):278-94. doi: 10.1177/016327879301600302.
9
Engaging families in longitudinal preventive intervention research: discrete-time survival analysis of socioeconomic and social-emotional risk factors.让家庭参与纵向预防干预研究:社会经济和社会情感风险因素的离散时间生存分析
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999 Feb;67(1):157-63. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.67.1.157.
10
A prospective validation study of inclination, belief, and context predictors of family-focused prevention involvement.
Fam Process. 1997 Dec;36(4):403-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1997.00403.x.