• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在回忆和识别主题相关和不相关句子时的提取诱发遗忘。

Retrieval-induced forgetting in recall and recognition of thematically related and unrelated sentences.

作者信息

Gómez-Ariza Carlos J, Lechuga M Teresa, Pelegrina Santiago, Bajo M Teresa

机构信息

Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de Jaén, Jaén, Spain.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2005 Dec;33(8):1431-41. doi: 10.3758/bf03193376.

DOI:10.3758/bf03193376
PMID:16615391
Abstract

In three experiments, we assessed the effects of type of relation and memory test on retrieval-induced forgetting of facts. In Experiments 1 and 2, eight sets of four shared-subject sentences were presented for study. They were constructed so that half were thematically related and half were unrelated. A retrieval practice phase required participants to recall a subset of the studied sentences. In the final test, the participants were prompted to recall all the sentences (character cued in Experiment 1 and character plus stem cued in Experiment 2). The results showed that the retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF) effect was similar for thematically related and unrelated sentences, indicating that the presence of episodic relations among the sentences was sufficient to produce the effect. In Experiment 3, a recognition task was introduced and the RIF effect emerged in accuracy as well as in latency measures. The presence of this effect with item-specific cues is difficult to accommodate for noninhibitory theories of retrieval.

摘要

在三项实验中,我们评估了关系类型和记忆测试对事实性信息提取诱发遗忘的影响。在实验1和实验2中,呈现了八组每组包含四个共享主题句子的集合供被试学习。这些句子的构建方式是,其中一半是主题相关的,另一半是不相关的。一个提取练习阶段要求参与者回忆所学习句子的一个子集。在最终测试中,提示参与者回忆所有句子(实验1中是字符提示,实验2中是字符加词干提示)。结果表明,主题相关和不相关句子的提取诱发遗忘(RIF)效应相似,这表明句子间情景关系的存在足以产生该效应。在实验3中,引入了一个识别任务,并且在准确率以及反应时测量中都出现了RIF效应。对于非抑制性提取理论而言,特定项目线索下这种效应的存在难以解释。

相似文献

1
Retrieval-induced forgetting in recall and recognition of thematically related and unrelated sentences.在回忆和识别主题相关和不相关句子时的提取诱发遗忘。
Mem Cognit. 2005 Dec;33(8):1431-41. doi: 10.3758/bf03193376.
2
Inhibition and retrieval of facts in young and older adults.年轻人和老年人对事实的抑制与提取
Exp Aging Res. 2009 Jan-Mar;35(1):83-97. doi: 10.1080/03610730802545234.
3
The selective directed forgetting effect: can people forget only part of a text?选择性定向遗忘效应:人们能否仅遗忘文本的一部分?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Aug;62(8):1542-50. doi: 10.1080/17470210902770049. Epub 2009 Apr 11.
4
Noncompetitive retrieval practice causes retrieval-induced forgetting in cued recall but not in recognition.非竞争性检索练习在线索回忆中会导致检索诱发遗忘,但在再认中则不会。
Mem Cognit. 2014 Apr;42(3):400-8. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0372-z.
5
A limit on retrieval-induced forgetting.对提取诱发遗忘的一种限制。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Sep;27(5):1314-9. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.27.5.1314.
6
Retrieval-induced forgetting and mental imagery.提取诱发遗忘与心理意象。
Mem Cognit. 2009 Sep;37(6):819-28. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.6.819.
7
Does Item Difficulty Affect the Magnitude of the Retrieval Practice Effect? An Evaluation of the Retrieval Effort Hypothesis.项目难度是否影响检索练习效应的大小?对检索努力假说的评估。
Span J Psychol. 2020 Aug 10;23:e31. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2020.33.
8
Retrieval-induced forgetting in a social context: Do the same mechanisms underlie forgetting in speakers and listeners?社会情境下的提取诱发遗忘:说话者和听话者遗忘的机制相同吗?
Mem Cognit. 2020 Jan;48(1):1-15. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00957-x.
9
Towards augmented human memory: Retrieval-induced forgetting and retrieval practice in an interactive, end-of-day review.增强人类记忆:在互动式、每日结束时的复习中使用检索诱发遗忘和检索练习。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 May;147(5):632-661. doi: 10.1037/xge0000441.
10
Remembering episodic memories is not necessary for forgetting of negative words: Semantic retrieval can cause forgetting of negative words.对负面词汇的遗忘并不需要回忆情景记忆:语义检索会导致对负面词汇的遗忘。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Jun;22(3):766-71. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0719-x.

引用本文的文献

1
The relative contribution of shape and colour to object memory.形状和颜色对物体记忆的相对贡献。
Mem Cognit. 2020 Nov;48(8):1504-1521. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01058-w.
2
Retrieval-induced forgetting in a social context: Do the same mechanisms underlie forgetting in speakers and listeners?社会情境下的提取诱发遗忘:说话者和听话者遗忘的机制相同吗?
Mem Cognit. 2020 Jan;48(1):1-15. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00957-x.
3
Improving Memory Inhibition: A Study of Retrieval Induced Forgetting, Executive Control, and Chronic Aerobic Exercise.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of inhibitory control in forgetting semantic knowledge.
Psychol Sci. 2004 Jul;15(7):448-53. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00700.x.
2
Retrieval-induced forgetting occurs in tests of item recognition.提取诱发遗忘出现在项目识别测试中。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Feb;11(1):125-30. doi: 10.3758/bf03206471.
3
Interference and integration: the fan effect in children and adults.
Memory. 2003 Nov;11(6):505-23. doi: 10.1080/09658210244000090.
4
改善记忆抑制:一项关于提取诱发遗忘、执行控制和长期有氧运动的研究。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Dec 19;12:318. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00318. eCollection 2018.
4
Towards augmented human memory: Retrieval-induced forgetting and retrieval practice in an interactive, end-of-day review.增强人类记忆:在互动式、每日结束时的复习中使用检索诱发遗忘和检索练习。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 May;147(5):632-661. doi: 10.1037/xge0000441.
5
Forgetting having denied: The "amnesic" consequences of denial.忘记曾予以否认:否认的“遗忘性”后果。
Mem Cognit. 2018 May;46(4):520-529. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0781-5.
6
Low involvement of preexisting associations makes retrieval-induced forgetting long lasting.先前关联的低参与度使得提取诱发遗忘具有持久性。
Cogn Process. 2015 May;16(2):121-30. doi: 10.1007/s10339-015-0650-8. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
7
On the reliability of retrieval-induced forgetting.检索诱发遗忘的可靠性。
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 21;5:1343. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01343. eCollection 2014.
8
Finding retrieval-induced forgetting in recognition tests: a case for baseline memory strength.在识别测试中发现提取诱发遗忘:基线记忆强度的一个案例。
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 29;5:1102. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01102. eCollection 2014.
9
Noncompetitive retrieval practice causes retrieval-induced forgetting in cued recall but not in recognition.非竞争性检索练习在线索回忆中会导致检索诱发遗忘,但在再认中则不会。
Mem Cognit. 2014 Apr;42(3):400-8. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0372-z.
10
High working memory capacity predicts less retrieval induced forgetting.高工作记忆容量预示着较少的提取诱发遗忘。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e52806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052806. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
Remembering can cause inhibition: retrieval-induced inhibition as cue independent process.
记忆会引发抑制:提取诱发抑制作为一种线索独立过程。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Mar;30(2):315-8. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.315.
5
Assessing the inhibitory account of retrieval-induced forgetting with implicit-memory tests.使用内隐记忆测试评估提取诱发遗忘的抑制理论。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Nov;28(6):1111-9.
6
The item and list methods of directed forgetting: test differences and the role of demand characteristics.定向遗忘的项目和列表方法:测试差异及需求特征的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1999 Mar;6(1):123-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03210819.
7
Semantic generation can cause episodic forgetting.语义生成会导致情景性遗忘。
Psychol Sci. 2002 Jul;13(4):356-60. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00464.
8
On the role of item similarity in retrieval-induced forgetting.论项目相似性在提取诱发遗忘中的作用。
Memory. 2002 May;10(3):215-24. doi: 10.1080/09658210143000362.
9
Forgetting our facts: the role of inhibitory processes in the loss of propositional knowledge.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Sep;130(3):544-70. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.3.544.
10
A limit on retrieval-induced forgetting.对提取诱发遗忘的一种限制。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Sep;27(5):1314-9. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.27.5.1314.