Greenland S
Department of Epidemiology, UCLA School of Public Health, UCLA College of Letters and Science, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA.
Risk Anal. 2001 Aug;21(4):579-83. doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.214136.
Standard statistical methods understate the uncertainty one should attach to effect estimates obtained from observational data. Among the methods used to address this problem are sensitivity analysis, Monte Carlo risk analysis (MCRA), and Bayesian uncertainty assessment. Estimates from MCRAs have been presented as if they were valid frequentist or Bayesian results, but examples show that they need not be either in actual applications. It is concluded that both sensitivity analyses and MCRA should begin with the same type of prior specification effort as Bayesian analysis.
标准统计方法低估了人们应赋予从观察性数据获得的效应估计值的不确定性。用于解决此问题的方法包括敏感性分析、蒙特卡洛风险分析(MCRA)和贝叶斯不确定性评估。MCRA的估计值呈现出来的样子就好像它们是有效的频率主义或贝叶斯结果,但实例表明,在实际应用中它们未必如此。得出的结论是,敏感性分析和MCRA都应像贝叶斯分析那样从相同类型的先验规范工作开始。