Waterhouse J, Edwards B, Nevill A, Carvalho S, Atkinson G, Buckley P, Reilly T, Godfrey R, Ramsay R
Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Br J Sports Med. 2002 Feb;36(1):54-60. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.36.1.54.
Travelling across multiple time zones disrupts normal circadian rhythms and induces "jet lag". Possible effects of this on training and performance in athletes were concerns before the Sydney Olympic Games.
To identify some determinants of jet lag and its symptoms.
A mixture of athletes, their coaches, and academics attending a conference (n = 85) was studied during their flights from the United Kingdom to Australia (two flights with a one hour stopover in Singapore), and for the first six days in Australia. Subjects differed in age, sex, chronotype, flexibility of sleeping habits, feelings of languor, fitness, time of arrival in Australia, and whether or not they had previous experience of travel to Australia. These variables and whether the body clock adjusted to new local time by phase advance or delay were tested as predictors for jet lag and some of its symptoms by stepwise multiple regression analyses.
The amount of sleep in the first flight was significantly greater in those who had left the United Kingdom in the evening than the morning (medians of 5.5 hours and 1.5 hours respectively; p = 0.0002, Mann-Whitney), whereas there was no significant difference on the second flight (2.5 hours v 2.8 hours; p = 0.72). Only the severity of jet lag and assessments of sleep and fatigue were commonly predicted significantly (p<0.05) by regression analysis, and then by only some of the variables. Thus increasing age and a later time of arrival in Australia were associated with less jet lag and fatigue, and previous experience of travel to Australia was associated with an earlier time of getting to sleep. Subjects who had adjusted by phase advance suffered worse jet lag during the 5th and 6th days in Australia.
These results indicate the importance of an appropriate choice of itinerary and lifestyle for reducing the negative effects of jet lag in athletes and others who wish to perform optimally in the new time zone.
跨越多个时区旅行会扰乱正常的昼夜节律并引发“时差反应”。在悉尼奥运会之前,人们就担心这对运动员训练和表现可能产生的影响。
确定时差反应及其症状的一些决定因素。
在从英国飞往澳大利亚的航班上(中途在新加坡停留1小时的两个航班)以及在澳大利亚的头六天,对参加一次会议的运动员、他们的教练和学者(n = 85)进行了研究。受试者在年龄、性别、昼夜节律类型、睡眠习惯灵活性、慵懒感、健康状况、抵达澳大利亚的时间以及是否有过前往澳大利亚旅行的经历等方面存在差异。通过逐步多元回归分析,将这些变量以及生物钟是通过相位提前还是延迟来适应新的当地时间,作为时差反应及其一些症状的预测指标进行了测试。
在首次航班上,晚上离开英国的人睡眠时间明显多于早上离开的人(中位数分别为5.5小时和1.5小时;p = 0.0002,曼-惠特尼检验),而在第二次航班上则没有显著差异(2.5小时对2.8小时;p = 0.72)。回归分析通常仅能显著预测(p<0.05)时差反应的严重程度以及睡眠和疲劳评估,而且只是部分变量能做到。因此,年龄增长和抵达澳大利亚的时间较晚与较轻的时差反应和疲劳相关,而之前有过前往澳大利亚旅行的经历与较早入睡时间相关。通过相位提前进行调整的受试者在澳大利亚的第5天和第6天遭受的时差反应更严重。
这些结果表明,对于减少时差反应对运动员和其他希望在新时区达到最佳表现的人的负面影响而言,选择合适的行程和生活方式非常重要。