• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期癌症患者家属对管理、护理及信息披露的评价。

The families evaluation on management, care and disclosure for terminal stage cancer patients.

作者信息

Mystakidou Kyriaki, Parpa Efi, Tsilika Eleni, Kalaidopoulou Ourania, Vlahos Lambros

机构信息

Pain Relief & Palliative Care Unit, Department of Radiology, Areteion Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Hellas, Greece.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2002 Apr 10;1(1):3. doi: 10.1186/1472-684x-1-3.

DOI:10.1186/1472-684x-1-3
PMID:11945181
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC102762/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Quality of life is an important concept which is subjective and personal; what is an acceptable quality of life to one may be 'worse than death' to another. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a questionnaire to assess relatives' perceptions and attitudes towards their terminal stage cancer patients' management (information disclosure, treatment choice, hospitalization and support-communication and care) including aspects regarding end-of-life and quality-of-life decisions. METHODS: The final study consisted of 146 relatives of advanced terminal stage cancer patients receiving palliation, attending a Pain Relief and Palliative Care Unit. The questionnaire incorporated 6 multi-item and 7 single-item scales, and was developed following a systematic review of measures appropriate for use in palliative care settings. RESULTS: Following analysis of the 25-item scale, the questionnaire has been validated as a shortened 21-item scale consisting of 5 multi-item and 5 single-item scales. Factor analysis was based upon information disclosure, hospitalization, and support-communication demonstrating Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.66, 0.5 and 0.70 respectively. Average item totals and inter-item scale correlations were between 0.62-0.70, with convergent validity correlations between 0.60-0.86. The questionnaire was well accepted by all subjects with an 8-10 minute completion time. CONCLUSION: The shortened 21-item self-assessment questionnaire may provide acceptable and valid assessment of caregiver(s)/Greek cancer patients' relatives perceptions on palliative care.

摘要

背景

生活质量是一个重要概念,具有主观性和个人性;对一个人来说可接受的生活质量对另一个人可能“比死亡还糟”。本研究的目的是开发并验证一份问卷,以评估亲属对其晚期癌症患者管理(信息披露、治疗选择、住院治疗以及支持沟通与护理)的看法和态度,包括与临终和生活质量决策相关的方面。

方法

最终研究纳入了146名接受姑息治疗的晚期癌症患者的亲属,他们均在一家疼痛缓解与姑息治疗科就诊。该问卷包含6个多项目量表和7个单项目量表,是在对适用于姑息治疗环境的测量方法进行系统综述后编制而成的。

结果

对这份25个条目的量表进行分析后,该问卷已被验证为一个缩短至21个条目的量表,由5个多项目量表和5个单项目量表组成。因子分析基于信息披露、住院治疗以及支持沟通,显示克朗巴赫α系数分别为0.66、0.5和0.70。平均项目总分与项目间量表相关性在0.62 - 0.70之间,收敛效度相关性在0.60 - 0.86之间。所有受试者对该问卷接受度良好,完成时间为8 - 10分钟。

结论

这份缩短至21个条目的自我评估问卷可能为护理人员/希腊癌症患者亲属对姑息治疗的看法提供可接受且有效的评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/367f/102762/91645b4cbb5f/1472-684X-1-3-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/367f/102762/91645b4cbb5f/1472-684X-1-3-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/367f/102762/91645b4cbb5f/1472-684X-1-3-1.jpg

相似文献

1
The families evaluation on management, care and disclosure for terminal stage cancer patients.晚期癌症患者家属对管理、护理及信息披露的评价。
BMC Palliat Care. 2002 Apr 10;1(1):3. doi: 10.1186/1472-684x-1-3.
2
Meaninglessness in terminally ill cancer patients: a validation study and nurse education intervention trial.晚期癌症患者的无意义感:一项验证性研究及护士教育干预试验
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Aug;34(2):160-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.10.021. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
3
The "Palliative Care Quality of Life Instrument (PQLI)" in terminal cancer patients.终末期癌症患者的“姑息治疗生活质量量表(PQLI)”
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Feb 12;2:8. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-8.
4
Assessment of change of quality of life in terminally ill patients under cancer pain management using the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in a Korean sample.使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(QLQ-C30)对韩国样本中接受癌症疼痛管理的晚期患者的生活质量变化进行评估。
Oncology. 2008;74 Suppl 1:7-12. doi: 10.1159/000143212. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
5
6
[Caregiver burden in relatives of persons with schizophrenia: an overview of measure instruments].[精神分裂症患者亲属的照顾者负担:测量工具概述]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):137-47.
7
Development of the Japanese version of the general practice assessment questionnaire: measurement of patient experience and testing of data quality.日本版全科医疗评估问卷的开发:患者体验测量与数据质量测试
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Nov 28;19(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0873-8.
8
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
9
Validation of the Polish version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 15 - Palliative Care in patients with advanced cancer.验证欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷 - 核心 15 问卷 - 晚期癌症患者姑息治疗的波兰语版本。
Palliat Med. 2013 May;27(5):470-7. doi: 10.1177/0269216312458823. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
10
Validation of the Mexican-Spanish version of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire for the evaluation of health-related quality of life in patients on palliative care.验证用于评估姑息治疗患者健康相关生活质量的 EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL 问卷的墨西哥西班牙语版。
Psychooncology. 2011 Aug;20(8):889-96. doi: 10.1002/pon.1801. Epub 2010 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Status and factors related to posttraumatic growth in patients with lung cancer: A STROBE-compliant article.肺癌患者创伤后成长的现状及相关因素:一篇符合STROBE标准的文章。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(7):e14314. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014314.
2
Does awareness of diagnosis influence health related quality of life in north Indian patients with lung cancer ?对诊断的认知会影响印度北部肺癌患者的健康相关生活质量吗?
Indian J Med Res. 2016 May;143(Supplement):S38-S44. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.191757.
3
A New Questionnaire (QRFPC25) Regarding the Religiosity and Spirituality in People with Life-Threatening Disease: Reliability and Validity in a Population of Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy.

本文引用的文献

1
Does awareness of diagnosis make any difference to quality of life? Determinants of emotional functioning in a group of cancer patients in Turkey.对诊断的认知会对生活质量产生影响吗?土耳其一组癌症患者情绪功能的决定因素。
Support Care Cancer. 2002 Jan;10(1):51-7. doi: 10.1007/s005200100308.
2
Impact of cancer on primary caregivers of patients receiving radiation therapy.
Acta Oncol. 2001;40(6):766-71. doi: 10.1080/02841860152619205.
3
Physician's attitudes towards disclosure of cancer diagnosis to elderly patients: a report from Tokyo, Japan.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2001 Aug;33(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4943(01)00099-1.
4
一份关于危及生命疾病患者宗教信仰和精神性的新问卷(QRFPC25):在接受放疗的癌症患者群体中的信度和效度
J Relig Health. 2017 Aug;56(4):1137-1154. doi: 10.1007/s10943-016-0310-z.
4
Disclosure of Cancer Information in Iran: a Perspective of Patients, Family Members, and Health Professionals.伊朗癌症信息的披露:患者、家庭成员及医疗专业人员的视角
Iran J Cancer Prev. 2011 Summer;4(3):130-4.
5
Pain and Anxiety versus Sense of Family Support in Lung Cancer Patients.肺癌患者的疼痛与焦虑对比家庭支持感
Pain Res Treat. 2014;2014:312941. doi: 10.1155/2014/312941. Epub 2014 Jul 13.
6
Caring for people at the end of life: Iranian oncology nurses' experiences.临终关怀:伊朗肿瘤护理人员的经历
Indian J Palliat Care. 2009 Jul;15(2):141-7. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.58461.
7
Non-disclosure of cancer diagnosis: an examination of personal, medical, and psychosocial factors.癌症诊断信息保密:个人、医疗和心理社会因素的考察。
Support Care Cancer. 2009 Aug;17(8):1101-7. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0568-0. Epub 2009 Jan 13.
8
A systematic review of measures of end-of-life care and its outcomes.对临终关怀措施及其结果的系统评价。
Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct;42(5):1848-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00721.x.
9
Ways to obtain a breast cancer diagnosis, consistency of information, patient satisfaction, and the presence of relatives.获得乳腺癌诊断的方式、信息的一致性、患者满意度以及亲属的陪伴情况。
Support Care Cancer. 2007 Jul;15(7):841-7. doi: 10.1007/s00520-006-0195-6.
10
What do patients receiving palliative care for cancer and their families want to be told? A Canadian and Australian qualitative study.接受癌症姑息治疗的患者及其家属希望被告知什么?一项加拿大和澳大利亚的定性研究。
BMJ. 2004 Jun 5;328(7452):1343. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38103.423576.55. Epub 2004 May 19.
Optimizing hospital-based home care for dying cancer patients: a population-based study.优化针对临终癌症患者的医院居家护理:一项基于人群的研究。
Palliat Med. 1999 Sep;13(5):385-92. doi: 10.1191/026921699669663451.
5
Cultural considerations in education for cancer pain management.癌症疼痛管理教育中的文化考量
J Cancer Educ. 1999 Fall;14(3):168-73. doi: 10.1080/08858199909528610.
6
Does the information level of cancer patients correlate with quality of life? A prospective study.
Tumori. 1998 Nov-Dec;84(6):619-23. doi: 10.1177/030089169808400601.
7
Dimensions of quality of life in prostate cancer.前列腺癌患者生活质量的维度
J Urol. 1998 Sep;160(3 Pt 1):807-10. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62792-7.
8
Uncertainty in prostate cancer. Ethnic and family patterns.前列腺癌的不确定性。种族与家族模式。
Cancer Pract. 1998 Mar-Apr;6(2):107-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-5394.1998.1998006107.x.
9
Measuring quality of life in men with prostate cancer using the functional assessment of cancer therapy-prostate instrument.使用癌症治疗功能评估-前列腺量表评估前列腺癌男性患者的生活质量。
Urology. 1997 Dec;50(6):920-8. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00459-7.
10
[The physical, mental and social impacts of telling prostate cancer patients the true diagnosis].告知前列腺癌患者真实诊断结果的身体、心理及社会影响
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 1997 Aug;88(8):752-61. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.88.752.