Deffenbacher Jerry L, Lynch Rebekah S, Oetting Eugene R, Swaim Randall C
Department of Psychology and Tri-Ethnic Center for Prevention Research, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523-1876, USA.
Behav Res Ther. 2002 Jun;40(6):717-37. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(01)00063-8.
Four ways people express their anger when driving were identified. Verbal Aggressive Expression (alpha=0.88) assesses verbally aggressive expression of anger (e.g., yelling or cursing at another driver); Personal Physical Aggressive Expression (alpha=0.81), the ways the person uses him/herself to express anger (e.g., trying to get out and tell off or have a physical fight with another driver); Use of the Vehicle to Express Anger (alpha=0.86), the ways the person uses his/her vehicle to express anger (e.g., flashing lights at or cutting another driver off in anger); and Adaptive/Constructive Expression (alpha=0.90), the ways the person copes positively with anger (e.g., focuses on safe driving or tries to relax). Aggressive forms can be summed into Total Aggressive Expression Index (alpha=0.90). Aggressive forms of expression correlated positively with each other (rs=0.39-0.48), but were uncorrelated or correlated negatively with adaptive/constructive expression (rs=-0.02 to -0.22). Aggressive forms of anger expression correlated positively with driving-related anger, aggression, and risky behavior; adaptive/constructive expression tended to correlate negatively with these variables. Differences in the strengths of correlations and regression analyses supported discriminant and incremental validity and suggested forms of anger expression contributed differentially to understanding driving-related behaviors. Theoretical and treatment implications were explored.
研究确定了人们在开车时表达愤怒的四种方式。言语攻击表达(α=0.88)评估愤怒的言语攻击表达(例如,对另一名司机大喊大叫或咒骂);个人身体攻击表达(α=0.81),指人们利用自身来表达愤怒的方式(例如,试图下车斥责或与另一名司机打架);利用车辆表达愤怒(α=0.86),指人们利用自己的车辆来表达愤怒的方式(例如,愤怒地向另一名司机闪灯或突然插到其前面);以及适应性/建设性表达(α=0.90),指人们积极应对愤怒的方式(例如,专注于安全驾驶或试图放松)。攻击性行为形式可汇总为总攻击表达指数(α=0.90)。攻击性行为形式之间呈正相关(rs=0.39 - 0.48),但与适应性/建设性表达不相关或呈负相关(rs=-0.02至-0.22)。愤怒表达的攻击性行为形式与驾驶相关的愤怒、攻击性和危险行为呈正相关;适应性/建设性表达往往与这些变量呈负相关。相关性强度和回归分析的差异支持了判别效度和增量效度,并表明愤怒表达形式对理解驾驶相关行为有不同的贡献。文中探讨了其理论和治疗意义。