Stenius B S, Lemola M
Clin Allergy. 1976 Mar;6(2):119-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1976.tb01889.x.
One-hundred and forty asthmatics were tested perorally with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), and/or with the azo-colour tartrazine; a fall in PEF of more than 20% was accepted as a positive result. About one quarter of the patients displayed a positive reaction to one of the two tested agents. No significant correlation was found between the reactions of these, and the presence of atopy, nasal polyposis, sinusitis, rhinitis, sensitivity to cold air, the age at onset, duration of asthma, or history of sensitivity to alcoholic drinks. The history suggested sensitivity to ingested, possibly coloured, food and drink, in only about one third of the tartrazine-positive cases. The ASA provocation tests were mainly applied to patients with doubtful or negative histories of sensitivity to ASA-containing drugs. The frequency of cross-reactivity between the two tested agents was statistically significant; patients reacting to tartrazine were for the most part, also sensitive to ASA. Tests for sensitivity to analgesics and food additives should be conducted as a routine measure in asthmatics, and sensitive patients should be given information on suitable medication and dietary control.
对140名哮喘患者进行了口服乙酰水杨酸(ASA)和/或偶氮色素柠檬黄的测试;呼气峰值流速(PEF)下降超过20%被视为阳性结果。约四分之一的患者对两种测试药物之一呈阳性反应。这些反应与特应性、鼻息肉、鼻窦炎、鼻炎、对冷空气敏感、发病年龄、哮喘病程或对酒精饮料敏感史之间未发现显著相关性。在仅约三分之一的柠檬黄阳性病例中,病史提示对摄入的、可能带颜色的食物和饮料敏感。ASA激发试验主要应用于对含ASA药物敏感史存疑或阴性的患者。两种测试药物之间交叉反应的频率具有统计学意义;对柠檬黄有反应的患者大多也对ASA敏感。对哮喘患者应常规进行镇痛药和食品添加剂敏感性测试,应对敏感患者提供合适药物治疗和饮食控制方面的信息。