• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挥鞭样损伤相关疾病患者保守治疗的随机临床试验:设计与动态治疗方案的考量

Randomized clinical trial of conservative treatment for patients with whiplash-associated disorders: considerations for the design and dynamic treatment protocol.

作者信息

Scholten-Peeters Gwendolijne G M, Verhagen Arianne P, Neeleman-van der Steen Catharina W M, Hurkmans John C A M, Wams Ria W A, Oostendorp Rob A B

机构信息

Dutch National Institute of Allied Health Professions, PO Box 1161, 3800 BD Amersfoort, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003 Sep;26(7):412-20. doi: 10.1016/S0161-4754(03)00092-7.

DOI:10.1016/S0161-4754(03)00092-7
PMID:12975627
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whiplash concerns a considerable problem to health care. Available evidence from systematic reviews indicates beneficial effects of active interventions for patients with whiplash injury. In order to evaluate whether a general practitioner or a physiotherapist should provide these active interventions, we have designed a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to present the design of the trial and to provide transparency into the dynamic treatment protocol used.

PATIENTS

Patients with whiplash-associated disorders grade I and II who still have symptoms and disabilities 4 weeks after the accident.

INTERVENTIONS

A dynamic treatment protocol consisting of 4 different subprotocols. The primary aim is to increase their activities and to improve their quality of life. Content and intensity of treatment are described. Outcome measures The primary outcome measures are pain and disability. The short-term effects are measured at 12 weeks and long-term effects at 1 year after the trauma.

CONCLUSION

To date, generally the effect of one intervention compared to another intervention has been examined. In our opinion, this cannot be considered as usual care for physiotherapy or general practice. Therefore, a dynamic treatment protocol has been developed to structure the black box of usual physiotherapy and general practice treatment. The results of this trial will be available in 0.5 year.

摘要

背景

挥鞭样损伤给医疗保健带来了相当大的问题。系统评价的现有证据表明,积极干预对挥鞭样损伤患者有有益效果。为了评估应由全科医生还是物理治疗师提供这些积极干预措施,我们设计了一项随机临床试验。

目的

本文的目的是介绍该试验的设计,并使所采用的动态治疗方案具有透明度。

患者

事故发生4周后仍有症状和残疾的I级和II级挥鞭样相关疾病患者。

干预措施

一种由4种不同子方案组成的动态治疗方案。主要目的是增加他们的活动并改善他们的生活质量。描述了治疗的内容和强度。结局指标主要结局指标是疼痛和残疾。在创伤后12周测量短期效果,在1年后测量长期效果。

结论

迄今为止,通常是比较一种干预措施与另一种干预措施的效果。我们认为,这不能被视为物理治疗或全科医疗的常规护理。因此,已制定了一种动态治疗方案,以构建常规物理治疗和全科医疗治疗的黑箱。该试验的结果将在半年后公布。

相似文献

1
Randomized clinical trial of conservative treatment for patients with whiplash-associated disorders: considerations for the design and dynamic treatment protocol.挥鞭样损伤相关疾病患者保守治疗的随机临床试验:设计与动态治疗方案的考量
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003 Sep;26(7):412-20. doi: 10.1016/S0161-4754(03)00092-7.
2
Education by general practitioners or education and exercises by physiotherapists for patients with whiplash-associated disorders? A randomized clinical trial.全科医生对挥鞭样相关疾病患者进行的教育,还是物理治疗师进行的教育及锻炼?一项随机临床试验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 1;31(7):723-31. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000206381.15224.0f.
3
Neck collar, "act-as-usual" or active mobilization for whiplash injury? A randomized parallel-group trial.颈托、“照常活动”还是积极活动来治疗挥鞭伤?一项随机平行组试验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Mar 15;32(6):618-26. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000257535.77691.bd.
4
Comparison of the relative benefits of 2 versus 10 days of soft collar cervical immobilization after acute whiplash injury.急性挥鞭伤后使用软颈托固定2天与10天的相对益处比较。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Nov;87(11):1423-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.07.268.
5
Active intervention in patients with whiplash-associated disorders improves long-term prognosis: a randomized controlled clinical trial.对挥鞭样损伤相关疾病患者进行积极干预可改善长期预后:一项随机对照临床试验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Nov 15;28(22):2491-8. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000090822.96814.13.
6
Education of patients after whiplash injury: is oral advice any better than a pamphlet?挥鞭伤后患者的教育:口头建议比宣传册更好吗?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Oct 15;33(22):E843-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318182bee2.
7
Physical therapy and active exercises--an adequate treatment for prevention of late whiplash syndrome? Randomized controlled trial in 200 patients.物理治疗和主动运动——预防迟发性挥鞭样综合征的充分治疗方法?对200名患者的随机对照试验。
Pain. 2006 Sep;124(1-2):69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.03.017. Epub 2006 May 11.
8
The immediate and long-term effects of exercise and patient education on physical, functional, and quality-of-life outcome measures after single-level lumbar microdiscectomy: a randomized controlled trial protocol.单节段腰椎间盘显微切除术后运动和患者教育对身体、功能及生活质量结局指标的近期和长期影响:一项随机对照试验方案
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 Aug 25;7:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-70.
9
Can exposure and acceptance strategies improve functioning and life satisfaction in people with chronic pain and whiplash-associated disorders (WAD)? A randomized controlled trial.暴露与接纳策略能否改善慢性疼痛和挥鞭样损伤相关疾病(WAD)患者的功能及生活满意度?一项随机对照试验。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2008;37(3):169-82. doi: 10.1080/16506070802078970.
10
Characterization of acute whiplash-associated disorders.急性挥鞭样损伤相关疾病的特征描述。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Jan 15;29(2):182-8. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000105535.12598.AE.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploratory Study of Associations and Agreement between Prognostic Patient-Registered Factors, Physiotherapists' Intuitive Synthesis, and Patient-Reported Factors in Whiplash-Associated Disorders.挥鞭样损伤相关疾病中患者登记的预后因素、物理治疗师的直观综合判断与患者报告因素之间的关联及一致性的探索性研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 16;12(6):2330. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062330.
2
Clinical Characteristics and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Primary Care Physiotherapy in Patients with Whiplash-Associated Disorders: A Longitudinal Observational Study.挥鞭样损伤相关疾病患者初级保健物理治疗的临床特征及患者报告结局:一项纵向观察性研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Sep 28;14:1733-1750. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S262578. eCollection 2020.
3
Measuring the impact of the French version of The Whiplash Book on both treatment approach and fear-avoidance beliefs among emergency physicians. A cluster randomized controlled trial.
测量《挥鞭样损伤手册》法译本对急诊医师治疗方法和规避恐惧信念的影响。一项整群随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 18;15(3):e0229849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229849. eCollection 2020.
4
Relationships Between Context, Process, and Outcome Indicators to Assess Quality of Physiotherapy Care in Patients with Whiplash-Associated Disorders: Applying Donabedian's Model of Care.颈部挥鞭伤相关疾病患者物理治疗质量评估中背景、过程和结果指标之间的关系:应用唐纳贝迪安护理模式
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Mar 2;14:425-442. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S234800. eCollection 2020.
5
Physical functioning and mindfulness skills training in chronic pain: a systematic review.慢性疼痛中的身体功能与正念技能训练:一项系统综述
J Pain Res. 2019 Jan 3;12:179-189. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S172733. eCollection 2019.
6
Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment.针对颈部疼痛的手法治疗和松动术与非主动对照或另一种主动治疗的对比。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 23;2015(9):CD004249. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004249.pub4.
7
The Effectiveness of Conservative Management for Acute Whiplash Associated Disorder (WAD) II: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.急性挥鞭样损伤相关病症(WAD)II保守治疗的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 21;10(7):e0133415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133415. eCollection 2015.
8
Assessment of the quality of life through the SF-36 questionnaire in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.通过SF-36问卷对慢性非特异性下腰痛患者的生活质量进行评估。
Acta Ortop Bras. 2013 Jul;21(4):202-7. doi: 10.1590/S1413-78522013000400004.
9
Patient education for neck pain.颈部疼痛的患者教育
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD005106. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005106.pub4.
10
Physiotherapy rehabilitation for whiplash associated disorder II: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.挥鞭样损伤相关疾病II的物理治疗康复:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2011 Nov 14;1(2):e000265. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000265. Print 2011.