Walters Scott T, Woodall W Gill
University of Texas School of Public Health, Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Prev Sci. 2003 Dec;4(4):287-94. doi: 10.1023/a:1026024400450.
To test the efficacy of mailed feedback for drinking reduction among employees of a manufacturing firm, 48 drinkers were recruited and alternately assigned to receive mailed feedback on their drinking either immediately or after an 8-week waiting period. Using a delayed treatment design, participants were assessed by mail at baseline, 8, and 16 weeks. After viewing their feedback, participants indicated a higher level of importance of making a change, but not confidence in their ability. There were also significant decreases in consumption after receiving the feedback, and these changes were mediated by participants' increased perceptions regarding the "riskiness" of alcohol consumption. An additional 26 nondrinkers at baseline volunteered to participate and also were mailed feedback. Among this group, receipt of feedback indicating a very low level of risk did not lead to increased drinking. This cost-effective intervention appears to reduce consumption among light-to-moderate drinkers, and may warrant a larger place in the framework of workplace alcohol reduction programs.
为了测试邮寄反馈对一家制造公司员工减少饮酒量的效果,招募了48名饮酒者,并将他们交替分配为立即或在等待8周后收到关于其饮酒情况的邮寄反馈。采用延迟治疗设计,在基线、第8周和第16周通过邮件对参与者进行评估。在查看反馈后,参与者表示改变的重要性更高,但对自己的能力缺乏信心。收到反馈后饮酒量也有显著下降,这些变化是由参与者对酒精消费“风险”的认知增加所介导的。另外26名基线时不饮酒的人自愿参与并也收到了邮寄反馈。在这一组中,收到表明风险极低的反馈并未导致饮酒量增加。这种具有成本效益的干预措施似乎能减少轻度至中度饮酒者的饮酒量,并且可能在工作场所减少酒精计划框架中占据更大的位置。