Vale R D, Malik F, Brown D
Department of Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco 94143.
J Cell Biol. 1992 Dec;119(6):1589-96. doi: 10.1083/jcb.119.6.1589.
Kinesin and dynein are motor proteins that move in opposite directions along microtubules. In this study, we examine the consequences of having kinesin and dynein (ciliary outer arm or cytoplasmic) bound to glass surfaces interacting with the same microtubule in vitro. Although one might expect a balance of opposing forces to produce little or no net movement, we find instead that microtubules move unidirectionally for several microns (corresponding to hundreds of ATPase cycles by a motor) but continually switch between kinesin-directed and dynein-directed transport. The velocities in the plus-end (0.2-0.3 microns/s) and minus-end (3.5-4 microns/s) directions were approximately half those produced by kinesin (0.5 microns/s) and ciliary dynein (6.7 microns/s) alone, indicating that the motors not contributing to movement can interact with and impose a drag upon the microtubule. By comparing two dyneins with different duty ratios (percentage of time spent in a strongly bound state during the ATPase cycle) and varying the nucleotide conditions, we show that the microtubule attachment times of the two opposing motors as well as their relative numbers determine which motor predominates in this assay. Together, these findings are consistent with a model in which kinesin-induced movement of a microtubule induces a negative strain in attached dyneins which causes them to dissociate before entering a force-generating state (and vice versa); reversals in the direction of transport may require the temporary dissociation of the transporting motor from the microtubule. The bidirectional movements described here are also remarkably similar to the back-and-forth movements of chromosomes during mitosis and membrane vesicles in fibroblasts. These results suggest that the underlying mechanical properties of motor proteins, at least in part, may be responsible for reversals in microtubule-based transport observed in cells.
驱动蛋白和动力蛋白是沿微管向相反方向移动的运动蛋白。在本研究中,我们检测了结合在玻璃表面的驱动蛋白和动力蛋白(纤毛外臂或胞质动力蛋白)在体外与同一微管相互作用的结果。尽管人们可能预期相反方向的力达到平衡会产生很少或没有净移动,但我们反而发现微管会单向移动几微米(相当于一个运动蛋白进行数百次ATP酶循环),但会不断在由驱动蛋白引导的运输和由动力蛋白引导的运输之间切换。正向(0.2 - 0.3微米/秒)和负向(3.5 - 4微米/秒)方向的速度大约是单独的驱动蛋白(0.5微米/秒)和纤毛动力蛋白(6.7微米/秒)产生速度的一半,这表明不参与移动的运动蛋白可以与微管相互作用并对其施加阻力。通过比较两种具有不同占空比(ATP酶循环中处于强结合状态的时间百分比)的动力蛋白并改变核苷酸条件,我们表明两个相反运动蛋白与微管的附着时间以及它们的相对数量决定了在该实验中哪种运动蛋白占主导。总之,这些发现与一个模型一致,在该模型中,驱动蛋白诱导的微管移动会在附着的动力蛋白中诱导负应变,导致它们在进入产生力的状态之前解离(反之亦然);运输方向的反转可能需要运输运动蛋白暂时与微管解离。这里描述的双向运动也与有丝分裂期间染色体和成纤维细胞中膜囊泡的来回运动非常相似。这些结果表明,运动蛋白的潜在机械特性至少部分可能是细胞中观察到的基于微管运输反转的原因。