Northridge Mary E, Sclar Elliott D, Biswas Padmini
Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
J Urban Health. 2003 Dec;80(4):556-68. doi: 10.1093/jurban/jtg064.
The overarching goal of this article is to make explicit the multiple pathways through which the built environment may potentially affect health and well-being. The loss of close collaboration between urban planning and public health professionals that characterized the post-World War II era has limited the design and implementation of effective interventions and policies that might translate into improved health for urban populations. First, we present a conceptual model that developed out of previous research called Social Determinants of Health and Environmental Health Promotion. Second, we review empirical research from both the urban planning and public health literature regarding the health effects of housing and housing interventions. And third, we wrestle with key challenges in conducting sound scientific research on connections between the built environment and health, namely: (1) the necessity of dealing with the possible health consequences of myriad public and private sector activities; (2) the lack of valid and reliable indicators of the built environment to monitor the health effects of urban planning and policy decisions, especially with regard to land use mix; and (3) the growth of the "megalopolis" or "super urban region" that requires analysis of health effects across state lines and in circumscribed areas within multiple states. We contend that to plan for healthy cities, we need to reinvigorate the historic link between urban planning and public health, and thereby conduct informed science to better guide effective public policy.
本文的总体目标是明确建成环境可能影响健康和福祉的多种途径。以二战后时期为特征的城市规划与公共卫生专业人员之间密切合作的缺失,限制了那些可能转化为城市人口健康改善的有效干预措施和政策的设计与实施。首先,我们提出一个基于先前研究“健康的社会决定因素与环境卫生促进”发展而来的概念模型。其次,我们回顾了城市规划和公共卫生文献中关于住房及住房干预措施对健康影响的实证研究。第三,我们应对在开展关于建成环境与健康之间联系的可靠科学研究时面临的关键挑战,即:(1)应对公共和私营部门众多活动可能产生的健康后果的必要性;(2)缺乏用于监测城市规划和政策决策对健康影响的有效且可靠的建成环境指标,尤其是在土地利用混合方面;(3)“特大城市”或“超级城市区域”的发展,这需要分析跨州界以及多个州内特定区域的健康影响。我们认为,为建设健康城市进行规划,我们需要重振城市规划与公共卫生之间的历史联系,从而开展明智的科学研究以更好地指导有效的公共政策。