Suppr超能文献

一项全国农村青年健康与安全倡议的影响:随机对照试验的结果

Impact of a national rural youth health and safety initiative: results from a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Lee Barbara C, Westaby James D, Berg Richard L

机构信息

Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, 1000 North Oak Avenue, Marshfield, WI 54449, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2004 Oct;94(10):1743-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.10.1743.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a comprehensive evaluation of a rural youth health and safety initiative implemented in 4000 National FFA (formerly Future Farmers of America) chapters across the United States.

METHODS

Data were collected from high school students and their FFA advisers at 3 time intervals (preintervention, immediate postintervention, and 1 year postintervention) with a 3-group (standard, enhanced, and control), cluster-randomized, controlled trial design.

RESULTS

Matched data from 3081 students and 81 advisers revealed no significant effect of this initiative on agricultural health and safety knowledge, safety attitudes, leadership, self-concept, and self-reported injuries of project participants. Data from 30 public health nurses following the intervention confirmed the program's failure to develop sustainable community partnerships.

CONCLUSIONS

This nationally coordinated initiative was funded with more than $1 million donated by agribusinesses. Program implementation was inconsistent, and desired outcomes were not achieved. Future efforts should better guide effective use of private sector resources aimed at reducing agricultural disease and injury among rural youths.

摘要

目标

我们对在美国4000个全国FFA(前身为美国未来农民协会)分会实施的一项农村青年健康与安全倡议进行了全面评估。

方法

采用三组(标准组、强化组和对照组)整群随机对照试验设计,在3个时间点(干预前、干预后即刻和干预后1年)从高中生及其FFA顾问那里收集数据。

结果

来自3081名学生和81名顾问的匹配数据显示,该倡议对项目参与者的农业健康与安全知识、安全态度、领导力、自我概念和自我报告的伤害没有显著影响。30名公共卫生护士在干预后的随访数据证实该项目未能建立可持续的社区伙伴关系。

结论

这项全国协调的倡议由农业综合企业捐赠的100多万美元资助。项目实施不一致,未实现预期成果。未来的努力应更好地指导有效利用私营部门资源,以减少农村青年中的农业疾病和伤害。

相似文献

1
Impact of a national rural youth health and safety initiative: results from a randomized controlled trial.
Am J Public Health. 2004 Oct;94(10):1743-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.10.1743.
2
Results of a rural school-based peer-led intervention for youth: goals for health.
J Sch Health. 2010 Feb;80(2):57-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00466.x.
3
Evaluation of a standardized all-terrain vehicle safety education intervention for youth in rural Central Illinois.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2013 Jan;4(1):8-13. doi: 10.1177/2150131912446374. Epub 2012 May 16.
5
Agricultural Disability Awareness and Risk Education (AgDARE) for high school students.
Inj Prev. 2001 Sep;7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i59-63. doi: 10.1136/ip.7.suppl_1.i59.
6
Rural Youth Disability Prevention Project Survey: results from 169 Iowa farm families.
J Rural Health. 1991 Spring;7(2):170-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.1991.tb00717.x.
8
9
Prevention of agricultural injuries: an evaluation of an education-based intervention.
Inj Prev. 2008 Oct;14(5):290-5. doi: 10.1136/ip.2008.018515.
10
Facilitators of community participation in an Aboriginal sexual health promotion initiative.
Rural Remote Health. 2018 Apr;18(2):4245. doi: 10.22605/RRH4245. Epub 2018 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of hearing conservation education programs for youth and young adults: a systematic review.
BMC Public Health. 2018 Nov 22;18(1):1286. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6198-7.
2
Efficacy of technology-based interventions to increase the use of hearing protections among adolescent farmworkers.
Int J Audiol. 2018 Feb;57(2):124-134. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1374568. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
4
School-based education programmes for the prevention of unintentional injuries in children and young people.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 27;12(12):CD010246. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010246.pub2.
6
Collaboration between local health and local government agencies for health improvement.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD007825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007825.pub6.
7
Interventions for preventing injuries in the agricultural industry.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD006398. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006398.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence-based public health: moving beyond randomized trials.
Am J Public Health. 2004 Mar;94(3):400-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.3.400.
2
Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent practices.
Am J Public Health. 2004 Mar;94(3):393-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.3.393.
4
What works in prevention. Principles of effective prevention programs.
Am Psychol. 2003 Jun-Jul;58(6-7):449-56. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.58.6-7.449.
6
Evaluation of interventions designed to prevent and control injuries.
Epidemiol Rev. 2003;25:51-9. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxg003.
7
Introduction: the scientific basis for injury control.
Epidemiol Rev. 2003;25:20-3. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxg009.
9
Community-based injury prevention interventions.
Future Child. 2000 Spring-Summer;10(1):83-110.
10
A systematic review of farm safety interventions.
Am J Prev Med. 2000 May;18(4 Suppl):51-62. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00141-0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验