Lee E W C, Chung M M H, Li A P S, Lo S K
Physiotherapy Department, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, SAR.
J Hand Surg Br. 2005 Feb;30(1):29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.09.010.
The study evaluated the construct validity of the Chinese Hong Kong version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH-HKPWH). Three hundred and thirty four patients with a broad range of upper extremity disorders were recruited into the study. Each completed DASH-HKPWH and SF-36 forms and their pain intensity (numeric pain rating scale) and grip strength were also measured. The mean DASH-HKPWH score was 40 (SD=20). Principal component factor analysis identified a single factor, which accounted for 47% of the total variance. Pearson correlation was applied to assess convergent and divergent validity of the DASH-HKPWH by comparison with the above-mentioned subjective and objective measurements. Our findings were comparable to the DASH of other languages.
该研究评估了香港中文版上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍问卷(DASH-HKPWH)的结构效度。334例患有各种上肢疾病的患者被纳入该研究。每位患者均完成了DASH-HKPWH和SF-36表格,并测量了其疼痛强度(数字疼痛评分量表)和握力。DASH-HKPWH的平均得分为40(标准差=20)。主成分因子分析确定了一个单一因子,其占总方差的47%。通过与上述主观和客观测量结果进行比较,采用Pearson相关性分析来评估DASH-HKPWH的收敛效度和区分效度。我们的研究结果与其他语言版本的DASH相当。