Brown Sharon A, Blozis Shelley A, Kouzekanani Kamiar, Garcia Alexandra A, Winchell Maria, Hanis Craig L
School of Nursing, The University of Texas at Austin, P.O. Box 7426, Austin, Texas 78713, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2005 Mar;28(3):527-32. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.3.527.
The objective of this study was to compare two diabetes self-management interventions designed for Mexican Americans: "extended" (24 h of education, 28 h of support groups) and "compressed" (16 h of education, 6 h of support groups). Both interventions were culturally competent regarding language, diet, social emphasis, family participation, and incorporating cultural beliefs.
We recruited 216 persons between 35 and 70 years of age diagnosed with type 2 diabetes >/=1 year. Intervention groups of eight participants and eight support persons were randomly assigned to the compressed or extended conditions. The interventions differed in total number of contact hours over the year-long intervention period, with the major difference being the number of support group sessions held. The same information provided in the educational sessions of the extended intervention was compressed into fewer sessions, thus providing more information during each group meeting.
The interventions were not statistically different in reducing HbA(1c); however, both were effective. A "dosage effect" of attendance was detected with the largest HbA(1c) reductions achieved by those who attended more of the extended intervention. For individuals who attended >/=50% of the intervention, baseline to 12-month HbA(1c) change was -0.6 percentage points for the compressed group and -1.7 percentage points for the extended group.
Both culturally competent diabetes self-management education interventions were effective in promoting improved metabolic control and diabetes knowledge. A dosage effect was evident; attending more sessions resulted in greater improvements in metabolic control.
本研究的目的是比较两种为墨西哥裔美国人设计的糖尿病自我管理干预措施:“扩展型”(24小时教育,28小时支持小组)和“压缩型”(16小时教育,6小时支持小组)。两种干预措施在语言、饮食、社会重点、家庭参与以及纳入文化信仰方面都具有文化适应性。
我们招募了216名年龄在35至70岁之间、被诊断患有2型糖尿病且病程≥1年的人。将八名参与者和八名支持人员组成的干预小组随机分配到压缩组或扩展组。在为期一年的干预期内,两种干预措施的总接触时长不同,主要差异在于支持小组会议的次数。扩展干预教育课程中提供的相同信息被压缩到更少的课程中,从而在每次小组会议期间提供更多信息。
在降低糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)方面,两种干预措施没有统计学差异;然而,两者都有效。发现了参与度的“剂量效应”,参与扩展干预更多的人糖化血红蛋白降低幅度最大。对于参与干预≥50%的个体,压缩组从基线到12个月糖化血红蛋白的变化为-0.6个百分点,扩展组为-1.7个百分点。
两种具有文化适应性的糖尿病自我管理教育干预措施在促进改善代谢控制和糖尿病知识方面均有效。剂量效应明显;参加更多课程会使代谢控制有更大改善。