Suppr超能文献

生物伦理原则与孔子的道德哲学。

The bioethical principles and Confucius' moral philosophy.

作者信息

Tsai D F-C

机构信息

Department of Social Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, No 1, Section 1, Jen-Ai Road, Taipei 100, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2005 Mar;31(3):159-63. doi: 10.1136/jme.2002.002113.

Abstract

This paper examines whether the modern bioethical principles of respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice proposed by Beauchamp and Childress are existent in, compatible with, or acceptable to the leading Chinese moral philosophy-the ethics of Confucius. The author concludes that the moral values which the four prima facie principles uphold are expressly identifiable in Confucius' teachings. However, Confucius' emphasis on the filial piety, family values, the "love of gradation", altruism of people, and the "role specified relation oriented ethics" will inevitably influence the "specification" and application of these bioethical principles and hence tend to grant "beneficence" a favourable position that diminishes the respect for individual rights and autonomy. In contrast, the centrality of respect for autonomy and its stance of "first among equals" are more and more stressed in Western liberal viewpoints. Nevertheless, if the Confucian "doctrine of Mean" (chung-yung) and a balanced "two dimensional personhood" approach are properly employed, this will require both theorists and clinicians, who are facing medical ethical dilemmas, of searching to attain due mean out of competing moral principles thus preventing "giving beneficence a priority" or "asserting autonomy must triumph".

摘要

本文探讨了博尚和奇尔德雷斯提出的尊重自主性、行善、不伤害和公正等现代生物伦理原则是否存在于中国主要道德哲学——孔子伦理学之中,是否与之兼容或为其接受。作者得出结论,这四条初步原则所秉持的道德价值观在孔子的教义中清晰可辨。然而,孔子对孝道、家庭价值观、“差等之爱”、人们的利他主义以及“角色特定关系导向伦理”的强调,将不可避免地影响这些生物伦理原则的“具体规定”和应用,从而倾向于给予“行善”一个有利地位,而这会削弱对个人权利和自主性的尊重。相比之下,西方自由主义观点越来越强调尊重自主性的核心地位及其“平等之中的首要地位”立场。然而,如果恰当地运用儒家的“中庸”学说和平衡的“二维人格”方法,这将要求面临医学伦理困境的理论家和临床医生在相互冲突的道德原则中寻求恰当的中庸之道,从而避免“优先考虑行善”或“断言自主性必须胜出”。

相似文献

3
Intimacy and Family Consent: A Confucian Ideal.亲密关系与家庭同意:一种儒家理想。
J Med Philos. 2015 Aug;40(4):418-36. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhv015. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
6
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.

引用本文的文献

2
(): a Distinctive Japanese Medical Virtue?( ):一种独特的日本医学美德?
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2023 Nov 4;16(4):563-573. doi: 10.1007/s41649-023-00261-6. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Avoiding Cultural Imperialism in the Human Right to Health.避免健康权中的文化帝国主义
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2021 Oct 19;14(1):87-101. doi: 10.1007/s41649-021-00190-2. eCollection 2022 Jan.
6
Ethical Pricing: a Confucian Perspective.道德定价:儒家视角
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2020 Oct 17;12(4):419-433. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00146-y. eCollection 2020 Dec.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验