• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种材料在五个不同种植体-基台界面的体外封闭能力。

In vitro sealing ability of two materials at five different implant-abutment surfaces.

作者信息

Duarte Antonio R C, Rossetti Paulo H O, Rossetti Leylha M N, Torres Sergio A, Bonachela Wellington C

机构信息

Oral Rehabilitation Program, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 2006 Nov;77(11):1828-32. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.060101.

DOI:10.1902/jop.2006.060101
PMID:17076607
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to test the sealing ability of two materials at five different implant-abutment surfaces.

METHODS

In the first phase, 2 mul brain-heart infusion (BHI) broth was deposited into the implant wells and glass culture tubes. A varnish or silicon sealant was applied at the cervical implant portion of experimental groups. The control group remained unexposed. The abutments were torque-tightened to 20 Ncm with a manual torque driver. Implants were immersed in 4 ml BHI broth at 37 degrees C for 2 hours to exclude contamination. In the second phase, 100 mul Enterococcus faecalis American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) strain 29212 was deposited into the glass culture tubes. After periods of 7, 14, 21, 35, 49, and 63 days, the sealing capacity was checked. Abutments were removed, and a sterile paper cone collected material inside implant bodies. This material was transferred to new tubes with BHI to verify the presence of cloudy broths within 24 to 48 hours.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the two materials for each time period (Fisher exact test; P >0.05). Group E showed the least level of sealing ability (six implants contaminated), whereas group T showed the highest level (only two implants).

CONCLUSIONS

  1. Materials tested were not able to prevent contamination over 63 days. 2) Bacterial contamination was verified after 14 and 35 days in the control and experimental groups, respectively. 3) Although materials tested had demonstrated similar sealing capacities, dental implants showed bacterial contamination regardless of their external or internal hexagonal configurations.
摘要

背景

本研究的目的是测试两种材料在五个不同种植体-基台界面的封闭能力。

方法

在第一阶段,将2微升脑心浸液(BHI)肉汤分别注入种植体窝和玻璃培养管中。对实验组种植体颈部应用清漆或硅密封剂。对照组不做处理。用手动扭矩螺丝刀将基台扭矩拧紧至20 Ncm。将种植体浸入37℃的4毫升BHI肉汤中2小时以排除污染。在第二阶段,将100微升粪肠球菌美国典型培养物保藏中心(ATCC)菌株29212注入玻璃培养管中。在7、14、21、35、49和63天后,检查封闭能力。移除基台,用无菌纸锥收集种植体内的材料。将该材料转移至含有BHI的新管中,在24至48小时内检查肉汤是否浑浊。

结果

在每个时间段,两种材料之间无统计学显著差异(Fisher精确检验;P>0.05)。E组的封闭能力最低(6个种植体被污染),而T组的封闭能力最高(仅2个种植体被污染)。

结论

1)测试材料在63天内无法防止污染。2)对照组和实验组分别在14天和35天后证实有细菌污染。3)尽管测试材料显示出相似的封闭能力,但无论其外部或内部六边形结构如何,牙种植体均出现细菌污染。

相似文献

1
In vitro sealing ability of two materials at five different implant-abutment surfaces.两种材料在五个不同种植体-基台界面的体外封闭能力。
J Periodontol. 2006 Nov;77(11):1828-32. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.060101.
2
In vitro evaluation of the implant-abutment bacterial seal: the locking taper system.种植体-基台细菌封闭的体外评估:锁定锥度系统
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 Sep-Oct;20(5):732-7.
3
Evaluation of the sealing capability of implants to titanium and zirconia abutments against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Fusobacterium nucleatum under different screw torque values.评估在不同螺钉扭矩值下种植体与钛和氧化锆基台对牙龈卟啉单胞菌、中间普氏菌和具核梭杆菌的封闭能力。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Sep;112(3):561-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.11.010. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
4
Microbial leakage through the implant-abutment interface of Morse taper implants in vitro.体外研究莫氏锥度种植体-基台界面处微生物渗漏
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Mar;21(3):328-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01837.x. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
5
Efficacy of antibacterial sealing gel and O-ring to prevent microleakage at the implant abutment interface: an in vitro study.抗菌封闭凝胶和O形环预防种植体基台界面微渗漏的效果:一项体外研究。
J Oral Implantol. 2014 Feb;40(1):11-4. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00167. Epub 2011 May 16.
6
Influence of repeated screw tightening on bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface.反复拧紧螺钉对种植体-基台界面细菌渗漏的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Dec;20(12):1394-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01769.x. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
7
The Role of Chlorhexidine on Endotoxin Penetration to the Implant-Abutment Interface (IAI).洗必泰在细菌内毒素渗透至种植体-基台界面(IAI)中的作用。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Jun;17(3):476-82. doi: 10.1111/cid.12158. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
8
Bacterial leakage in implants with different implant-abutment connections: an in vitro study.不同种植体-基台连接体的细菌渗漏:一项体外研究。
J Periodontol. 2012 Apr;83(4):491-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110320. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
9
In vitro evaluation of bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of an external-hex implant after saliva incubation.唾液孵育后体外评估外六角种植体-基台界面的细菌渗漏情况。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(4):782-7.
10
Fluids and microbial penetration in the internal part of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-abutment connections.骨水泥固位与螺丝固位种植体-基台连接内部的液体和微生物渗透情况。
J Periodontol. 2001 Sep;72(9):1146-50. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.72.9.1146.

引用本文的文献

1
Retrospective Study of Functional and Esthetic Outcomes Using Narrow-Diameter Implants for Single Upper Central Incisor Replacements.使用窄直径种植体进行单颗上颌中切牙种植修复的功能和美学效果的回顾性研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Mar 26;13(4):144. doi: 10.3390/dj13040144.
2
Factors Influencing the Screw Stability of Implant-Supported Single Crowns: An In Vitro Study.影响种植体支持单冠螺钉稳定性的因素:一项体外研究。
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jan 23;18(3):506. doi: 10.3390/ma18030506.
3
Microleakage along the implant-abutment interface: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.
种植体-基台界面微渗漏:体外研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Implant Dent. 2023 Sep 21;9(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00494-y.
4
Evaluation of customized cobalt-chromium abutments fabricated with different manufacturing process versus titanium stock abutments on the marginal misfit -An study.不同制作工艺的定制钴铬合金基台与钛基台边缘适合性的比较——一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022 Jul-Sep;22(3):225-232. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_381_21.
5
Sealing Efficacy of the Original and Third-Party Custom-Made Abutments-Microbiological In Vitro Pilot Study.原装与第三方定制基台的封闭效果——微生物体外初步研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 Feb 21;15(4):1597. doi: 10.3390/ma15041597.
6
Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy and Permeability of Various Sealing Materials at the Implant-Abutment Interface-A Pilot In Vitro Study.种植体-基台界面不同封闭材料抗菌效果及渗透性的评估——一项体外初步研究
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jan 14;14(2):385. doi: 10.3390/ma14020385.
7
Oral bacterial colonization on dental implants restored with titanium or zirconia abutments: 6-month follow-up.钛或氧化锆基台修复的牙种植体表面口腔细菌定植:6 个月随访。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Jul;22(6):2335-2343. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2334-0. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
8
Efficacy of a new coating of implant-abutment connections in reducing bacterial loading: an study.一种新型种植体-基台连接涂层在减少细菌附着方面的效果:一项研究。
Oral Implantol (Rome). 2017 Apr 10;10(1):1-10. doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.1.001. eCollection 2017 Jan-Mar.
9
Impact of Dynamic Loading on the Implant-abutment Interface Using a Gas-enhanced Permeation Test In Vitro.使用气体增强渗透试验在体外研究动态加载对种植体-基台界面的影响。
Open Dent J. 2015 Mar 31;9:112-9. doi: 10.2174/1874210601509010112. eCollection 2015.
10
Micro-leakage at the implant-abutment interface with different tightening torques in vitro.不同拧紧扭矩下种植体-基台界面的微渗漏:体外研究。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 Sep-Oct;20(5):581-7. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572012000500015.