Peters Remco P H, Savelkoul Paul H M, Simoons-Smit Alberdina M, Danner Sven A, Vandenbroucke-Grauls Christina M J E, van Agtmael Michiel A
Department of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Jan;44(1):119-23. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.1.119-123.2006.
Rapid identification of microorganisms in blood cultures is required to optimize empirical treatment at an early stage. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) can reduce the time to identification of microorganisms in growth-positive blood cultures. In this study, we evaluated the performance, time to identification, and potential clinical benefits of FISH compared to those of conventional culture methods in routine practice. After Gram staining, blood culture fluids were simultaneously further identified with FISH and with conventional culture methods. Results and points in time of FISH and culture identification (provisional and final identifications) were collected and compared. For 91% of microorganisms, the genus or family name was identified, and for 79%, the species name could be attributed. The sensitivity and specificity of the individual probes exceeded 95%, except for the Enterobacteriaceae probe (sensitivity, 89%). Cross-hybridization was obtained with the Klebsiella pneumoniae probe for Klebsiella oxytoca. The time gains of FISH and final culture identification were more than 18 h for bacteria and 42 h for yeasts. With FISH, Staphylococcus aureus was differentiated from coagulase-negative staphylococci 1.4 h faster than by provisional identification (P < 0.001). In conclusion, FISH allows rapid and reliable identification of the majority of microorganisms in growth-positive blood cultures. The substantial time gain of identification with FISH may allow same-day adjustment of antimicrobial therapy, and FISH is especially useful if no provisional identification is obtained. With further extension of the number of probes and a reduction in turnaround time, FISH will become a very useful diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of bloodstream infections.
为了在早期优化经验性治疗,需要快速鉴定血培养中的微生物。荧光原位杂交(FISH)可以缩短生长阳性血培养中微生物的鉴定时间。在本研究中,我们评估了FISH与常规培养方法相比在常规实践中的性能、鉴定时间和潜在临床益处。革兰氏染色后,血培养液同时用FISH和常规培养方法进行进一步鉴定。收集并比较FISH和培养鉴定(初步和最终鉴定)的结果及时间点。对于91%的微生物,鉴定出了属或科的名称,对于79%的微生物,可以确定种名。除肠杆菌科探针(敏感性为89%)外,各探针的敏感性和特异性均超过95%。肺炎克雷伯菌探针与产酸克雷伯菌发生了交叉杂交。对于细菌,FISH和最终培养鉴定的时间缩短超过18小时,对于酵母则超过42小时。使用FISH,金黄色葡萄球菌与凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌的鉴别比初步鉴定快1.4小时(P < 0.001)。总之,FISH能够快速、可靠地鉴定生长阳性血培养中的大多数微生物。FISH鉴定时间的大幅缩短可能允许当日调整抗菌治疗,并且如果未获得初步鉴定,FISH特别有用。随着探针数量的进一步增加和周转时间的缩短,FISH将成为血流感染诊断中非常有用的诊断工具。