Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 8BT, UK.
BMC Oral Health. 2006 Jan 31;6:3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-6-3.
The 'high-risk approach' is a commonly adopted strategy recommended for the prevention of dental caries in populations. The scientific basis for the strategy has been questioned. The objective of this study is to assess the contribution that children identified at 'high-risk' made towards the total of new caries lesions over a 4-year period, by analysing the distribution of new lesions per 100 children.
Data are from the National Preventive Dentistry Demonstration Programme (NPDDP) in the United States. The analyses identified the distribution of new carious lesions over a 4-year period in four groups of 7 year-old children who received differing preventive regimes.
The majority of new lesions occurred in those children classified at lowest caries risk at baseline. Irrespective of the preventive regime adopted and the initial caries levels, children classified as 'highest risk' contributed less than 6% of the total number of new lesions developing over 4 years.
These findings challenge the basis for the adoption of a high-risk strategy.
“高危方法”是一种常用于预防人群龋齿的常用策略。该策略的科学依据受到质疑。本研究的目的是通过分析每 100 名儿童新龋病的分布,评估在 4 年期间被确定为“高危”的儿童对新龋病的总贡献。
数据来自美国国家预防牙科示范计划(NPDDP)。该分析确定了在接受不同预防方案的四组 7 岁儿童中,4 年内新龋病的分布情况。
大多数新病变发生在基线时龋齿风险最低的儿童中。无论采用何种预防方案和初始龋齿水平,被归类为“最高风险”的儿童在 4 年内发展的新病变总数中不到 6%。
这些发现挑战了采用高危策略的基础。