Cozzani Valerio, Bandini Riccardo, Basta Claudia, Christou Michalis D
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica, Mineraria e delle Tecnologie Ambientali, Università di Bologna, viale Risorgimento no. 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy.
J Hazard Mater. 2006 Aug 21;136(2):170-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.12.031. Epub 2006 Feb 17.
Land-use planning (LUP) with respect to major accident hazards is one of the more important requirements of Directive 96/82/EC (the so-called Seveso II Directive). Different approaches were developed by the Member States of the European Union in order to implement this aspect of the Directive. This study focuses on the comparison of the specific approaches developed for LUP with respect to major accidents hazards. An Italian industrial area has been selected to perform a case study. The different LUP criteria have been used both to evaluate the present state of the area and the effect of several proposed hazard reduction actions. The results obtained have allowed a comparison of the different LUP methodologies. Critical steps in the application of the different LUP criteria have been identified, and the different priorities of hazard reduction actions resulting from risk-based and consequence-based approaches have been highlighted.
针对重大事故危险的土地利用规划（LUP）是96/82/EC号指令（即所谓的《塞韦索二号指令》）的一项较为重要的要求。欧盟成员国为实施该指令的这一方面制定了不同的方法。本研究着重比较针对重大事故危险所制定的土地利用规划的具体方法。已选取意大利的一个工业区进行案例研究。不同的土地利用规划标准已用于评估该区域的现状以及若干拟议的降低危险行动的效果。所获得的结果有助于对不同的土地利用规划方法进行比较。已确定了应用不同土地利用规划标准过程中的关键步骤，并突出了基于风险和基于后果的方法所产生的降低危险行动的不同优先次序。
