• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模拟驾驶员在与车内技术交互时的视觉注意力分配情况。

Modeling drivers' visual attention allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies.

作者信息

Horrey William J, Wickens Christopher D, Consalus Kyle P

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Appl. 2006 Jun;12(2):67-78. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.12.2.67.

DOI:10.1037/1076-898X.12.2.67
PMID:16802889
Abstract

In 2 experiments, the authors examined how characteristics of a simulated traffic environment and in-vehicle tasks impact driver performance and visual scanning and the extent to which a computational model of visual attention (SEEV model) could predict scanning behavior. In Experiment 1, the authors manipulated task-relevant information bandwidth and task priority. In Experiment 2, the authors examined task bandwidth and complexity, while introducing infrequent traffic hazards. Overall, task priority had a significant impact on scanning; however, the impact of increasing bandwidth was varied, depending on whether the relevant task was supported by focal (e.g., in-vehicle tasks; increased scanning) or ambient vision (e.g., lane keeping; no increase in scanning). The computational model accounted for approximately 95% of the variance in scanning across both experiments.

摘要

在两项实验中,作者研究了模拟交通环境和车内任务的特征如何影响驾驶员的表现和视觉扫描,以及视觉注意力计算模型(SEEV模型)能够在多大程度上预测扫描行为。在实验1中,作者操纵了与任务相关的信息带宽和任务优先级。在实验2中,作者研究了任务带宽和复杂性,同时引入了不常见的交通危险。总体而言,任务优先级对扫描有显著影响;然而,带宽增加的影响各不相同,这取决于相关任务是由焦点视觉(如车内任务;扫描增加)还是周边视觉(如车道保持;扫描无增加)支持。该计算模型解释了两项实验中扫描差异的约95%。

相似文献

1
Modeling drivers' visual attention allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies.模拟驾驶员在与车内技术交互时的视觉注意力分配情况。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2006 Jun;12(2):67-78. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.12.2.67.
2
An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction: impacts on drivers' visual behavior and braking performance.认知分心的道路评估:对驾驶员视觉行为和制动性能的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Mar;39(2):372-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.08.013. Epub 2006 Oct 19.
3
Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance.驾驶员注意力分散:车内并行任务、道路环境复杂性和年龄对驾驶性能的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2006 Jan;38(1):185-91. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.09.007. Epub 2005 Oct 12.
4
The role of looming and attention capture in drivers' braking responses.逼近和注意力捕获在驾驶员制动反应中的作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Jul;40(4):1375-82. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.02.009. Epub 2008 Mar 24.
5
The effect of simulated cataracts on drivers' hazard perception ability.模拟白内障对驾驶员危险感知能力的影响。
Optom Vis Sci. 2008 Dec;85(12):1121-7. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31818e8d00.
6
The effects of practice with MP3 players on driving performance.使用MP3播放器练习对驾驶性能的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Mar;40(2):704-13. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.09.014. Epub 2007 Oct 3.
7
Engrossed in conversation: the impact of cell phones on simulated driving performance.全神贯注于交谈:手机对模拟驾驶表现的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2006 Mar;38(2):415-21. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.10.015. Epub 2005 Nov 28.
8
What does the driver look at? The influence of intersection characteristics on attention allocation and driving behavior.驾驶员看什么?交叉口特征对注意力分配和驾驶行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Mar;45:610-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.09.048. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
9
Dissociation between driving performance and drivers' subjective estimates of performance and workload in dual-task conditions.在双重任务条件下,驾驶表现与驾驶员对表现和工作量的主观估计之间的分离。
J Safety Res. 2009;40(1):7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2008.10.011. Epub 2009 Jan 24.
10
Visual attention and the transition from novice to advanced driver.视觉注意力与从新手到熟练驾驶员的转变。
Ergonomics. 2007 Aug;50(8):1235-49. doi: 10.1080/00140130701318707.

引用本文的文献

1
Note on the Dual-Task Paradigm and its Use to Measure Listening Effort.关于双重任务范式及其用于测量听力努力的说明。
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241292215. doi: 10.1177/23312165241292215.
2
Gaze transition entropy as a measure of attention allocation in a dynamic workspace involving automation.注视转移熵作为一种衡量在涉及自动化的动态工作空间中注意力分配的方法。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 8;14(1):23405. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74244-4.
3
Resolving uncertainty on the fly: modeling adaptive driving behavior as active inference.即时解决不确定性:将适应性驾驶行为建模为主动推理。
Front Neurorobot. 2024 Mar 21;18:1341750. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2024.1341750. eCollection 2024.
4
Expectancy or Salience?-Replicating Senders' Dial-Monitoring Experiments With a Gaze-Contingent Window.预期还是显著性?——使用注视相关窗口复制发送者的拨号监控实验
Hum Factors. 2024 Jun;66(6):1770-1785. doi: 10.1177/00187208231176148. Epub 2023 May 21.
5
Attention-Setting and Human Mental Function.注意力设定与人类心理功能。
J Imaging. 2022 Jun 1;8(6):159. doi: 10.3390/jimaging8060159.
6
Effects of verbal tasks on driving simulator performance.口头任务对驾驶模拟器性能的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Feb 4;7(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00357-x.
7
Drivers' Attention Strategies before Eyes-off-Road in Different Traffic Scenarios: Adaptation and Anticipation.驾驶员在不同交通场景下的眼离道路前的注意策略:适应与预判。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 2;18(7):3716. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073716.
8
Eye tracking use in researching driver distraction: A scientometric and qualitative literature review approach.眼动追踪技术在研究驾驶员分心方面的应用:一种科学计量学与定性文献综述方法
J Eye Mov Res. 2019 Sep 30;12(3). doi: 10.16910/jemr.12.3.5.
9
Impact of adolescent media multitasking on cognition and driving safety.青少年媒体多任务处理对认知和驾驶安全的影响。
Hum Behav Emerg Technol. 2019 Apr;1(2):161-168. doi: 10.1002/hbe2.143. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
10
Multitasking in Driving as Optimal Adaptation Under Uncertainty.驾驶中的多重任务处理是不确定性下的最优适应
Hum Factors. 2021 Dec;63(8):1324-1341. doi: 10.1177/0018720820927687. Epub 2020 Jul 30.