• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Decision biases in intertemporal choice and choice under uncertainty: testing a common account.

作者信息

Chapman Gretchen B, Weber Bethany J

机构信息

Psychology Department, Rutgers University, 152 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8020, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2006 Apr;34(3):589-602. doi: 10.3758/bf03193582.

DOI:10.3758/bf03193582
PMID:16933768
Abstract

Two experiments were performed to test a psychophysical account of parallels between biases in risky choice and intertemporal choice. Experiment 1 demonstrated the common difference effect in intertemporal choice and the common ratio effect in risky choice. As was predicted, these two biases were uncorrelated with each other, although each was correlated across monetary/health domains. This result is consistent with the supposition that these two biases result from psychophysical properties of two different dimensions (time and probability, respectively). Experiment 2 examined the magnitude effect in intertemporal choice and the peanuts effect in risky choice. These two biases were correlated with each other but were uncorrelated across monetary/health domains. This result is consistent with the supposition that these two biases result from psychophysical properties of the same dimension (utility of money or health).

摘要

相似文献

1
Decision biases in intertemporal choice and choice under uncertainty: testing a common account.
Mem Cognit. 2006 Apr;34(3):589-602. doi: 10.3758/bf03193582.
2
An evaluation and comparison of models of risky intertemporal choice.风险跨期选择模型的评价与比较。
Psychol Rev. 2020 Nov;127(6):1097-1138. doi: 10.1037/rev0000223. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
3
Adaptive History Biases Result from Confidence-Weighted Accumulation of past Choices.适应性历史偏差源于过去选择的置信度加权积累。
J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 7;38(10):2418-2429. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2189-17.2017. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
4
Decoy effects in intertemporal and probabilistic choices the role of time pressure, immediacy, and certainty.跨期和概率选择中的诱饵效应:时间压力、即时性和确定性的作用
Behav Processes. 2019 May;162:130-141. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
5
The Attraction Effect Modulates Reward Prediction Errors and Intertemporal Choices.吸引力效应调节奖励预测误差和跨期选择。
J Neurosci. 2017 Jan 11;37(2):371-382. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2532-16.2016.
6
Testing the effect of risk on intertemporal choice in the Chinese cultural context.测试风险对中国文化背景下跨期选择的影响。
J Soc Psychol. 2011 Jul-Aug;151(4):517-22. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2010.503719.
7
Dynamic cognitive models of intertemporal choice.跨期选择的动态认知模型。
Cogn Psychol. 2018 Aug;104:29-56. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
8
Automatic biases in intertemporal choice.跨期选择中的自动偏见。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Apr;26(2):661-668. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01579-9.
9
Scarcity makes people short-sighted? Evidence from intertemporal decision-making.稀缺会使人目光短浅吗?来自跨期决策的证据。
Psych J. 2024 Jun;13(3):429-439. doi: 10.1002/pchj.714. Epub 2023 Dec 17.
10
The format in which uncertainty information is presented affects decision biases.不确定性信息的呈现方式会影响决策偏差。
Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;18(3):240-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01883.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Whether temporal discounting is domain-specific between health outcomes and money: a systematic review and meta-analysis.健康结果与金钱之间的时间贴现是否具有领域特异性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Feb;47(1):31-45. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01846-3. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
2
Uncertainty and Demand for Insurance: A Theoretical Model of How Self-Control Manages the Optimal Decision-Making.不确定性与保险需求:自我控制如何管理最优决策的理论模型
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 17;12:700289. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.700289. eCollection 2021.
3
Departures from optimality when pursuing multiple approach or avoidance goals.

本文引用的文献

1
Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease as amounts increase.延迟折扣概率奖励:奖励金额越高,折扣率越低。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Mar;3(1):100-4. doi: 10.3758/BF03210748.
2
Temporal discounting and preference reversals in choice between delayed outcomes.延迟结果选择中的时间折扣和偏好反转。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Sep;1(3):383-9. doi: 10.3758/BF03213979.
3
A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards.一种用于具有延迟和概率性奖励的选择的折扣框架。
在追求多种趋近或回避目标时偏离最优状态。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Jul;101(7):1056-66. doi: 10.1037/apl0000082. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
4
How costs influence decision values for mixed outcomes.混合结局下成本如何影响决策值。
Front Neurosci. 2012 Oct 26;6:146. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00146. eCollection 2012.
5
Shared decision making in mental health: prospects for personalized medicine.心理健康领域的共同决策:个性化医疗的前景。
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2009;11(4):455-63. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2009.11.4/redrake.
6
Overlapping and distinct neural systems code for subjective value during intertemporal and risky decision making.在跨期和风险决策过程中,重叠且不同的神经系统对主观价值进行编码。
J Neurosci. 2009 Dec 16;29(50):15727-34. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3489-09.2009.
7
Temporal decision-making: insights from cognitive neuroscience.时间决策:来自认知神经科学的见解
Front Behav Neurosci. 2009 Oct 23;3:39. doi: 10.3389/neuro.08.039.2009. eCollection 2009.
8
The subjective value of delayed and probabilistic outcomes: Outcome size matters for gains but not for losses.延迟和概率性结果的主观价值:结果大小对收益有影响,但对损失没有影响。
Behav Processes. 2010 Jan;83(1):36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.09.003. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
9
Neural dissociation of delay and uncertainty in intertemporal choice.跨期选择中延迟与不确定性的神经分离
J Neurosci. 2008 Dec 31;28(53):14459-66. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5058-08.2008.
10
The neural substrates of probabilistic and intertemporal decision making.概率性和跨期决策的神经基础。
Brain Res. 2008 Oct 9;1234:104-15. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.105. Epub 2008 Aug 6.
Psychol Bull. 2004 Sep;130(5):769-92. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.769.
4
Is discounting impulsive?. Evidence from temporal and probability discounting in gambling and non-gambling college students.折扣是否冲动?来自赌博和非赌博大学生时间折扣和概率折扣的证据。
Behav Processes. 2003 Oct 31;64(3):355-367. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(03)00141-4.
5
Time Preference for Health: A Test of Stationarity versus Decreasing Timing Aversion.对健康的时间偏好:平稳性与时间厌恶递减的检验
J Math Psychol. 2001 Apr;45(2):265-282. doi: 10.1006/jmps.2000.1312.
6
Delay or probability discounting in a model of impulsive behavior: effect of alcohol.冲动行为模型中的延迟或概率折扣:酒精的影响
J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Mar;71(2):121-43. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.71-121.
7
Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes.奖励量对延迟结果和概率性结果的折扣有相反的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999 Mar;25(2):418-27. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.25.2.418.
8
Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward.时间折扣率随奖励量的增加而降低。
Mem Cognit. 1997 Sep;25(5):715-23. doi: 10.3758/bf03211314.
9
Risk attitude and time discounting.风险态度与时间贴现。
Med Decis Making. 1997 Jul-Sep;17(3):355-6. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9701700315.
10
Temporal discounting and utility for health and money.健康与金钱的时间贴现及效用
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 May;22(3):771-91. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.22.3.771.