Meenan R F, Mason J H, Anderson J J, Guccione A A, Kazis L E
Arthritis Center, School of Medicine, Boston University, MA.
Arthritis Rheum. 1992 Jan;35(1):1-10. doi: 10.1002/art.1780350102.
The goal of this project was to develop a more comprehensive and sensitive version of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS).
AIMS scale items were revised, and 3 new scales were added to evaluate arm function, work, and social support. Sections were also added to assess satisfaction with function, attribution of problems to arthritis, and self-designation of priority areas for improvement. The new instrument was designated the AIMS2. A pilot test of format and content and a performance test of reliability and validity were carried out.
Questionnaire completion times in a pilot study of 24 subjects averaged 23 minutes, and evaluations were positive regarding the instrument's length and ease of completion, and the subjects' willingness to complete serial forms and return them by mail. Measurement performance was tested in 408 subjects: 299 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and 109 with osteoarthritis (OA); 45 of these subjects completed a second AIMS2 within 3 weeks. Internal consistency coefficients for the 12 scales were 0.72-0.91 in the RA group and 0.74-0.96 in the OA group. Test-retest reliability was 0.78-0.94. All within-scale factor analyses produced single factors, except for mobility level in OA. Validity analyses in both the RA and the OA groups showed that patient designation of an area as a problem or as a priority for improvement was significantly associated with a poorer AIMS2 scale score in that area. Reliability, factor analysis, and validity results were consistent in age, sex, and education subgroups. Satisfaction was moderately correlated with level of function in the same health status area, and the satisfaction items formed a reliable scale. Responses to the arthritis attribution items showed that most dysfunction in this sample was due to arthritis.
The AIMS2 is a revised and expanded health status questionnaire with excellent measurement properties that should be useful in arthritis clinical trials and in outcomes research.
本项目的目标是开发一个更全面、更敏感的关节炎影响测量量表(AIMS)版本。
对AIMS量表项目进行了修订,并增加了3个新量表以评估手臂功能、工作和社会支持。还增加了一些部分来评估对功能的满意度、将问题归因于关节炎以及自行指定优先改进领域。新工具被命名为AIMS2。进行了格式和内容的预测试以及信度和效度的性能测试。
在一项对24名受试者的预研究中,问卷完成时间平均为23分钟,受试者对问卷长度、填写难易程度以及他们填写系列表格并通过邮件返还的意愿评价积极。在408名受试者中测试了测量性能:299名类风湿关节炎(RA)患者和109名骨关节炎(OA)患者;其中45名受试者在3周内完成了第二次AIMS2测试。RA组12个量表的内部一致性系数为0.72 - 0.91,OA组为0.74 - 0.96。重测信度为0.78 - 0.94。除OA组的活动水平外,所有量表内因子分析均产生单一因子。RA组和OA组的效度分析均表明,患者将某个领域指定为问题或优先改进领域与该领域较差的AIMS2量表得分显著相关。信度、因子分析和效度结果在年龄、性别和教育亚组中一致。满意度与同一健康状况领域的功能水平呈中度相关,且满意度项目形成了一个可靠的量表。对关节炎归因项目的回答表明,该样本中的大多数功能障碍是由关节炎引起的。
AIMS2是一个经过修订和扩展的健康状况问卷,具有出色的测量特性,应有助于关节炎临床试验和结局研究。