Suppr超能文献

习惯性身体活动对年轻人和老年人的急性和短期能量摄入调节有不同影响。

Habitual physical activity differentially affects acute and short-term energy intake regulation in young and older adults.

作者信息

Van Walleghen E L, Orr J S, Gentile C L, Davy K P, Davy B M

机构信息

Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.

出版信息

Int J Obes (Lond). 2007 Aug;31(8):1277-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803579. Epub 2007 Mar 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Energy intake (EI) regulation is impaired in older adults, but it is not known if habitual physical activity affects accuracy of EI regulation in older compared with young adults.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that the ability to compensate for a high-energy yogurt preload beverage at a subsequent ad libitum meal (i.e. acute compensation) and over the course of the testing day (i.e. short-term compensation) would decrease with age, but the magnitude of the decline would be smaller in physically active compared with sedentary older adults.

DESIGN

On two occasions, young active (n=15), young sedentary (n=14), older active (n=14) and older sedentary (n=11) subjects consumed either a high-energy yogurt preload beverage (YP: 500 ml, 1988 kJ, men; 375 ml, 1507 kJ, women), or no preload (NP), 30 min before an ad libitum test meal. EI at both ad libitum meals was measured, and total daily EI was determined on both testing days. Percent EI compensation for the YP was calculated for the test meal and testing day to determine acute and short-term compensation.

RESULTS

Percent EI compensation at the test meal was significantly lower in the older compared with the young subjects (65+/-4 vs 81+/-4%, P=0.005). There was no effect of habitual physical activity level on acute compensation, and no age by physical activity level interaction (P=0.60). In contrast, short-term compensation was not different with age (87+/-5 vs 93+/-6%, older vs young, P=0.45), but was more accurate in active vs sedentary subjects (100+/-5 vs 79+/-6%, P=0.01). As with acute compensation, there was no age by physical activity interaction (P=0.39).

CONCLUSION

Acute EI regulation is impaired in older adults, which is not attenuated by physical activity status. However, EI regulation over the course of a day is more accurate in active vs sedentary adults, which may facilitate long-term energy balance. Future work is needed to determine if higher energy expenditure in older active vs older sedentary adults improves long-term EI regulation.

摘要

背景

老年人的能量摄入(EI)调节功能受损,但与年轻人相比,习惯性身体活动是否会影响老年人EI调节的准确性尚不清楚。

目的

我们假设,在随后的随意进餐时(即急性补偿)以及在测试日期间(即短期补偿),补偿高能量酸奶预负荷饮料的能力会随着年龄增长而下降,但与久坐不动的老年人相比,身体活跃的老年人下降幅度会更小。

设计

年轻活跃组(n = 15)、年轻久坐组(n = 14)、老年活跃组(n = 14)和老年久坐组(n = 11)的受试者分两次在随意测试餐前进食前30分钟,分别饮用高能量酸奶预负荷饮料(YP:男性500毫升,1988千焦;女性375毫升,1507千焦)或不饮用预负荷饮料(NP)。测量两次随意进餐时的EI,并在两个测试日确定每日总EI。计算测试餐和测试日YP的EI补偿百分比,以确定急性和短期补偿。

结果

与年轻受试者相比,老年受试者在测试餐时的EI补偿百分比显著更低(65±4%对81±4%,P = 0.005)。习惯性身体活动水平对急性补偿没有影响,且不存在年龄与身体活动水平的交互作用(P = 0.60)。相比之下,短期补偿在年龄上没有差异(87±5%对93±6%,老年对年轻,P = 0.45),但在活跃受试者与久坐受试者之间更准确(100±5%对79±6%,P = 0.01)。与急性补偿一样,不存在年龄与身体活动的交互作用(P = 0.39)。

结论

老年人的急性EI调节受损,且不受身体活动状态的影响。然而,在一天中,活跃成年人的EI调节比久坐成年人更准确,这可能有助于长期能量平衡。需要进一步的研究来确定,与老年久坐成年人相比,老年活跃成年人更高的能量消耗是否能改善长期EI调节。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验