Li Emmy Y M, Mohamed Shaheeda, Leung Christopher K S, Rao Srinivas K, Cheng Arthur C K, Cheung Carol Y L, Lam Dennis S C
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Ophthalmology. 2007 Oct;114(10):1842-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.02.017. Epub 2007 May 15.
To assess the agreement of central and paracentral corneal thickness measurements between ultrasound pachymetry (USP), Orbscan II, and Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT).
Observational cross-sectional study.
Seventy eyes of 70 subjects.
Each subject underwent Orbscan II (using an acoustic equivalent correction factor of 0.89), ASOCT, and USP examination. Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate agreement between instruments.
Central and paracentral corneal thickness measurements by the 3 methods and agreement, as evaluated by 95% limits of agreement (LOA).
The mean measurements of average central corneal thickness by USP, Orbscan II, and ASOCT were 553.5+/-30.26 microm, 553.22+/-25.47 microm, and 538.79+/-26.22 microm, respectively. There was high correlation between instruments: USP with ASOCT (r = 0.936, P<0.001), USP with Orbscan II (r = 0.900, P<0.001) for central corneal thickness measurements, and Orbscan II with ASOCT for average paracentral 2- to 5-mm measurements (r = 0.947, P<0.001). The mean differences (and upper/lower LOA) for central corneal thickness measurements were 0.31+/-13.34 microm (26.44/-25.83) between USP and Orbscan II, 14.74+/-10.84 microm (36.0/-6.51) between USP and ASOCT, and 14.44+/-9.14 microm (32.36/-3.48) between Orbscan II and ASOCT. The average mean difference (and upper/lower LOA) between Orbscan II and ASOCT for paracentral 2- to 5-mm corneal thickness measurements was 10.35+/-8.67 microm (27.35/-6.65).
Anterior segment optical coherence tomography underestimated corneal thickness compared with that measured with USP. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography had better agreement with the gold standard USP, as compared with Orbscan II. However, important discrepancies among instruments exist. Clinicians should be aware that corneal thickness measurements are influenced by the method of measurement and that, although highly correlated, these instruments should not be used interchangeably for the assessment of corneal thickness.
评估超声角膜测厚法(USP)、Orbscan II和Visante眼前节光学相干断层扫描(ASOCT)测量中央和旁中央角膜厚度的一致性。
观察性横断面研究。
70名受试者的70只眼。
每位受试者均接受Orbscan II(使用声学等效校正因子0.89)、ASOCT和USP检查。采用Bland-Altman图评估仪器之间的一致性。
通过3种方法测量的中央和旁中央角膜厚度以及一致性,通过95%一致性界限(LOA)进行评估。
USP、Orbscan II和ASOCT测量的平均中央角膜厚度分别为553.5±30.26微米、553.22±25.47微米和538.79±26.22微米。仪器之间存在高度相关性:中央角膜厚度测量中,USP与ASOCT(r = 0.936,P<0.001)、USP与Orbscan II(r = 0.900,P<0.001)相关,旁中央2至5毫米平均测量中,Orbscan II与ASOCT相关(r = 0.947,P<0.001)。中央角膜厚度测量的平均差异(及上下LOA)为:USP与Orbscan II之间为0.31±13.34微米(26.44/-25.83),USP与ASOCT之间为14.74±10.84微米(36.0/-6.51),Orbscan II与ASOCT之间为14.44±9.14微米(32.36/-3.48)。旁中央2至5毫米角膜厚度测量中,Orbscan II与ASOCT之间的平均平均差异(及上下LOA)为10.35±8.67微米(27.35/-6.65)。
与USP测量结果相比,眼前节光学相干断层扫描低估角膜厚度。与Orbscan II相比,眼前节光学相干断层扫描与金标准USP的一致性更好。然而,仪器之间存在重要差异。临床医生应意识到角膜厚度测量受测量方法影响,并且尽管这些仪器高度相关,但在评估角膜厚度时不应互换使用。