Suppr超能文献

非接触式中央角膜厚度测量的重复性和一致性:一项比较研究。

Repeatability and agreement of central corneal thickness measurement with non-contact methods: a comparative study.

作者信息

Mansoori Tarannum, Balakrishna Nagalla

机构信息

Sita Lakshmi Glaucoma Center, Anand Eye Institute, Habsiguda, Hyderabad, 500007, India.

Department of Statistics, National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, 5000017, India.

出版信息

Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun;38(3):959-966. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0543-1. Epub 2017 Apr 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements and reliability of RTVue XR-100 anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), AL-scan optical biometer and Schwind Sirius anterior segment analysis system.

METHODS

The CCT was measured in one hundred and twenty-seven eyes of 127 healthy subjects with AS-OCT, AL-scan and Sirius system. Mean CCT was compared among the instruments, and the level of agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots. One eye each of 30 subjects was randomly assigned for intrasession intraoperator and interoperator repeatability which was assessed using coefficient of variation and intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Mean CCT with AS-OCT, AL-scan and Sirius system was 496.72 ± 32.75, 507.43 ± 33.54 and 512.08 ± 33.1 µm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between AL-scan and Sirius system (p = 0.26). Significant difference was found between AS-OCT/AL-scan (p = 0.01) and AS-OCT/Sirius system (p < 0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis showed a high level of agreement between AL-Scan/Sirius system (Mean difference -4.6 µm) and a low level of agreement between AS-OCT/AL-scan (Mean difference -10.7 µm) and OCT/Sirius system (Mean difference -15.4 µm).

CONCLUSIONS

AS-OCT underestimated CCT measurements when compared to other two devices in healthy subjects. Hence, one must be cautious when analyzing the results from different machines and should be aware that the measurement values are not interchangeable.

摘要

目的

比较RTVue XR - 100眼前节光学相干断层扫描(AS - OCT)、AL - scan光学生物测量仪和Schwind Sirius眼前节分析系统测量中央角膜厚度(CCT)的结果及可靠性。

方法

使用AS - OCT、AL - scan和Sirius系统对127名健康受试者的127只眼睛进行CCT测量。比较各仪器测得的平均CCT,并使用Bland - Altman图评估一致性水平。随机选取30名受试者的每只眼睛中的一只,进行操作者内和操作者间的测量重复性评估,评估指标为变异系数和组内相关系数。

结果

AS - OCT、AL - scan和Sirius系统测得的平均CCT分别为496.72 ± 32.75、507.43 ± 33.54和512.08 ± 33.1 µm。AL - scan和Sirius系统之间无统计学显著差异(p = 0.26)。AS - OCT/AL - scan(p = 0.01)和AS - OCT/Sirius系统(p < 0.0001)之间存在显著差异。Bland - Altman分析显示,AL - Scan/Sirius系统之间一致性较高(平均差异 - 4.6 µm),而AS - OCT/AL - scan(平均差异 - 10.7 µm)和OCT/Sirius系统(平均差异 - 15.4 µm)之间一致性较低。

结论

在健康受试者中,与其他两种设备相比,AS - OCT低估了CCT测量值。因此,在分析不同仪器的结果时必须谨慎,并应意识到测量值不可互换。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验