Leslie Toby, Mayan M Ismail, Hasan M Anwar, Safi M Hanif, Klinkenberg Eveline, Whitty Christopher J M, Rowland Mark
HealthNet TPO Malaria and Leishmaniasis Control Programme, Peshawar, Northwest Frontier Province, Pakistan.
JAMA. 2007 May 23;297(20):2201-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.20.2201.
In areas where Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax coexist and treatments for the 2 species differ, misdiagnosis can lead to poor outcomes in either disease. A unified therapy effective against both species would reduce reliance on species-specific diagnosis, which in many areas is difficult to maintain. The antifolates are an important and affordable antimalarial class to which it is often assumed P vivax malaria is intrinsically resistant.
To test the relative efficacy and safety of 2 antifolate drugs against P vivax malaria and compare each with chloroquine.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: An open-label randomized controlled trial comparing chloroquine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, and chlorproguanil-dapsone for the treatment of P vivax malaria was conducted in eastern Afghanistan and northwestern Pakistan, areas in which P vivax malaria predominates. A total of 20,410 patients older than 3 years were screened; 767 patients (315 in Pakistan and 452 in Afghanistan) with confirmed P vivax malaria were enrolled and followed up daily for 4 days, then weekly for 28 days, between March 2004 and June 2006.
Complete clearance of parasites with no recrudescence by day 14. Secondary outcomes included being parasite-free by day 28, clinical failure, and anemia.
By day 14, only 1 patient in the sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine group had parasites. By day 28, failure rates were found in 2 of 153 patients (1.3%) in the chloroquine group, 5 of 290 patients (1.7%) in the sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine group, and 27 of 272 patients (9.9%) in the chlorproguanil-dapsone group. Chlorproguanil-dapsone was less effective than sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 6.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-17.0; P<.001) and chloroquine (adjusted OR, 8.4; 95% CI, 2.0-36.5; P = .004). Chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine were equivalent in efficacy at day 28 (adjusted OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.3-7.0; P = .73). Chloroquine cleared gametocytes and asexual parasites more rapidly than sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine or chlorproguanil-dapsone did. All drugs were well tolerated.
Although chloroquine remains the drug of choice, antifolates are effective against P vivax malaria in South Asia. These drugs may be appropriate for unified treatment where species-specific diagnosis is unavailable, most likely in combination with other drugs.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00158561.
在恶性疟原虫和间日疟原虫共存且两种疟原虫治疗方法不同的地区,误诊会导致两种疾病的治疗效果都不佳。一种对两种疟原虫都有效的统一疗法将减少对特定疟原虫种类诊断的依赖,而在许多地区这种诊断很难维持。抗叶酸药物是一类重要且价格低廉的抗疟药物,人们通常认为间日疟原虫对其具有内在抗性。
测试两种抗叶酸药物治疗间日疟原虫疟疾的相对疗效和安全性,并将每种药物与氯喹进行比较。
设计、地点和患者:在阿富汗东部和巴基斯坦西北部(间日疟原虫疟疾为主的地区)进行了一项开放标签随机对照试验,比较氯喹、磺胺多辛 - 乙胺嘧啶和氯胍 - 氨苯砜治疗间日疟原虫疟疾的效果。共筛查了20410名3岁以上患者;2004年3月至2006年6月期间,767名确诊为间日疟原虫疟疾的患者(巴基斯坦315名,阿富汗452名)入组,每天随访4天,然后每周随访28天。
到第14天寄生虫完全清除且无复发。次要结局包括到第28天无寄生虫、临床治疗失败和贫血。
到第14天,磺胺多辛 - 乙胺嘧啶组只有1名患者有寄生虫。到第28天,氯喹组153名患者中有2名(1.3%)治疗失败,磺胺多辛 - 乙胺嘧啶组290名患者中有5名(1.7%)治疗失败,氯胍 - 氨苯砜组272名患者中有27名(9.9%)治疗失败。氯胍 - 氨苯砜的疗效低于磺胺多辛 - 乙胺嘧啶(调整优势比[OR]为6.4;95%置信区间[CI]为2.4 - 17.0;P <.001)和氯喹(调整OR为8.4;95%CI为2.0 - 36.5;P =.004)。氯喹和磺胺多辛 - 乙胺嘧啶在第28天的疗效相当(调整OR为1.3;95%CI为0.3 - 7.0;P =.73)。氯喹清除配子体和无性寄生虫的速度比磺胺多辛 - 乙胺嘧啶或氯胍 - 氨苯砜更快。所有药物耐受性良好。
虽然氯喹仍是首选药物,但抗叶酸药物对南亚的间日疟原虫疟疾有效。在无法进行特定疟原虫种类诊断的情况下,这些药物可能适合统一治疗,很可能与其他药物联合使用。
clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00158561。