Liang M H, Fortin P R, Isenberg D A, Snaith L
Department of Rheumatology/Immunology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Robert B. Brigham Multipurpose Arthritis Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
Rheumatol Int. 1991;11(3):133-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00304502.
No single test allows an adequate measure of disease activity in multisystem diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In order to evaluate the spectrum of manifestations of disease activity in SLE, investigators have developed numerous ad hoc scales which have not been tested for their validity or reliability. Three instruments have been extensively studied: the British Isles Lupus Activity Group instrument (BILAG), the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), and the Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM). All three have been demonstrated to have convergent and construct validity when compared to the clinician's judgement. The summation of the number of criteria of the American Rheumatism Association (ARA) SLE criteria has been shown to be an inadequate measure of disease activity. Standardized measures of disease activity for SLE should enhance our ability to compare results from different centers in finer distinctions than dead or alive.
没有任何一项单一检测能够充分衡量系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)等多系统疾病的疾病活动度。为了评估SLE疾病活动度的表现谱,研究人员开发了众多临时量表,但这些量表尚未经过有效性或可靠性测试。有三种工具得到了广泛研究:英伦三岛狼疮活动组工具(BILAG)、SLE疾病活动指数(SLEDAI)和系统性狼疮活动量度(SLAM)。与临床医生的判断相比,所有这三种工具都已被证明具有收敛效度和结构效度。美国风湿病协会(ARA)SLE标准的标准总和已被证明不足以衡量疾病活动度。SLE疾病活动度的标准化测量应能增强我们以比生死更细微的差异来比较不同中心结果的能力。