Abela John R Z, Aydin Cristina M, Auerbach Randy P
Department of Psychology, McGill University, Stewart Biological Sciences Building, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2007 Dec;35(6):913-27. doi: 10.1007/s10802-007-9143-2.
We propose that researchers should utilize ratio scores when examining the response styles theory rather than examine each of the response styles separately. Higher ratio scores indicate a higher probability of engaging in ruminative, as opposed to distracting and problem solving, behaviors. In Phase One, we examined the factor structure and reliability of the Children's Response Styles Questionnaire (CRSQ) in a sample of 287 third through sixth grade schoolchildren. A two factor solution was obtained: (1) Rumination and (2) Distraction and Problem Solving. Both factors exhibited strong psychometric properties. In Phase Two, 140 children completed the CRSQ and the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI). Six weeks later, children completed the CDI. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the two-factor solution fit the data well. In line with hypotheses, CRSQ ratio scores were more strongly associated with CDI residual change scores than were either CRSQ rumination or distraction and problem solving scores.
我们建议研究人员在检验反应风格理论时应使用比率分数，而不是分别检验每种反应风格。较高的比率分数表明参与沉思行为的可能性更高，而不是分心和解决问题的行为。在第一阶段，我们在287名三至六年级学童的样本中检验了儿童反应风格问卷（CRSQ）的因子结构和信度。得到了一个双因子解决方案：（1）沉思和（2）分心与解决问题。两个因子都表现出很强的心理测量特性。在第二阶段，140名儿童完成了CRSQ和儿童抑郁量表（CDI）。六周后，儿童再次完成了CDI。验证性因子分析表明双因子解决方案与数据拟合良好。与假设一致，CRSQ比率分数与CDI残余变化分数的相关性比CRSQ沉思分数或分心与解决问题分数更强。
