• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床神经科学研究中的伦理问题:患者视角

Ethical issues in clinical neuroscience research: a patient's perspective.

作者信息

Cohen Perry D, Herman Linda, Jedlinski Sheryl, Willocks Peggy, Wittekind Paula

机构信息

Parkinson Pipeline Project, Washington, DC 20015, USA.

出版信息

Neurotherapeutics. 2007 Jul;4(3):537-44. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2007.04.008.

DOI:10.1016/j.nurt.2007.04.008
PMID:17599719
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7479722/
Abstract

A patient-centered paradigm for clinical research and medical care is presented as a solution to the problem of declining innovation and increasing costs and development time in the pipeline for new therapies. Fundamental differences in values and motivations among scientists, clinicians, industry sponsor, and patients in neurotherapeutics provide a framework for analysis of ethical conflicts and the loss of public confidence in medical research. Parkinson advocates' views on clinical trial participation, perceived risks and benefits, placebo controls, and sham surgery are presented. These views reflect the sense of urgency and the unique perspective that comes from living with this progressive, debilitating condition full time. A patient-centered paradigm that includes authentic voices of patients as collaborators at every stage of development will help to resolve conflicts, build trust, recruit trial participants, and accelerate new therapies. Key elements are adaptive clinical trial methods and the development of information technology for the assessment of outcomes and surveillance of safety over the life cycle of a medical product. Supported by the Parkinson's Disease Foundation, the Parkinson Pipeline Project is a grassroots group of Parkinson's patients whose goal is to represent an authentic voice for patients in the treatment development process. This group promotes education and communication between members of the Parkinson's community and active stakeholders in medical research, industry, and regulatory agencies. Its members are an example of a new breed of knowledgeable consumers, armed with first-hand access to research findings and reinforced by on-line connections to like-minded peers throughout the world.

摘要

本文提出了一种以患者为中心的临床研究和医疗范式,作为解决新疗法创新下降、成本增加以及研发时间延长问题的方案。神经治疗领域的科学家、临床医生、行业赞助商和患者在价值观和动机上的根本差异,为分析伦理冲突以及公众对医学研究信心丧失提供了一个框架。文中介绍了帕金森病倡导者对于临床试验参与、感知到的风险和益处、安慰剂对照以及假手术的观点。这些观点反映了紧迫感以及因长期患有这种渐进性、使人衰弱的疾病而产生的独特视角。一种在开发的每个阶段都将患者的真实声音纳入其中作为合作者的以患者为中心的范式,将有助于解决冲突、建立信任、招募试验参与者并加速新疗法的研发。关键要素包括适应性临床试验方法以及开发用于评估医疗产品生命周期内结果和监测安全性的信息技术。帕金森管道项目由帕金森病基金会支持,是一个由帕金森病患者组成的草根团体,其目标是在治疗开发过程中代表患者发出真实的声音。该团体促进帕金森病群体成员与医学研究、行业和监管机构中的活跃利益相关者之间的教育和交流。其成员是新一代知识渊博的消费者的典范,他们能够直接获取研究结果,并通过与世界各地志同道合的同行建立在线联系而得到强化。

相似文献

1
Ethical issues in clinical neuroscience research: a patient's perspective.临床神经科学研究中的伦理问题:患者视角
Neurotherapeutics. 2007 Jul;4(3):537-44. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2007.04.008.
2
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Conflicts of interest in research involving human beings.涉及人类的研究中的利益冲突。
J Int Bioethique. 2008 Mar-Jun;19(1-2):143-54, 202-3. doi: 10.3917/jib.191.0143.
5
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
6
Guidelines, editors, pharma and the biological paradigm shift.指南、编辑、制药行业与生物学范式转变
Mens Sana Monogr. 2007 Jan;5(1):27-30. doi: 10.4103/0973-1229.32176.
7
Exercise- and strategy-based physiotherapy-delivered intervention for preventing repeat falls in people with Parkinson's: the PDSAFE RCT.基于运动和策略的物理治疗干预预防帕金森病患者反复跌倒:PDSAFE RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Jul;23(36):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta23360.
8
Cell-based interventions for neurologic conditions: ethical challenges for early human trials.用于神经系统疾病的细胞干预:早期人体试验的伦理挑战。
Neurology. 2008 Jul 22;71(4):288-93. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000316436.13659.80. Epub 2008 May 7.
9
Stem cells and neurology: cues for ethical reflections.干细胞与神经学:伦理思考的线索
Neurol Sci. 2004 Jun;25(2):108-13. doi: 10.1007/s10072-004-0241-4.
10
[Medicine: conflicts of interest in research].[医学:研究中的利益冲突]
Rev Invest Clin. 2003 May-Jun;55(3):339-46.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical implications of neurotechnology in industry-academia partnerships: Insights from patient and research participant interviews.神经技术在产学研合作中的伦理意义:来自患者和研究参与者访谈的见解
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 2;20(9):e0330367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330367. eCollection 2025.
2
Building advocacy into research.将宣传融入研究。
Dis Model Mech. 2023 Dec 1;16(12). doi: 10.1242/dmm.050646. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
3
Towards conceptualizing patients as partners in health systems: a systematic review and descriptive synthesis.将患者概念化为卫生系统的合作伙伴:系统评价和描述性综合。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jan 25;21(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00954-8.
4
Increasing access to clinical research using an innovative mobile recruitment approach: The (MoRe) concept.采用创新的移动招募方法增加临床研究的参与机会:(MoRe)概念。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Jul 18;19:100623. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100623. eCollection 2020 Sep.
5
The 10-year Landscape of United States-Registered Parkinson Disease Clinical Trials: 2007-2016.2007 - 2016年美国注册帕金森病临床试验的十年全景
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2018 Oct 4;5(5):512-518. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12665. eCollection 2018 Sep-Oct.
6
Placebo in Surgical Research: A Case-Based Ethical Analysis and Practical Consequences.外科研究中的安慰剂:基于案例的伦理分析与实际影响
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:2627181. doi: 10.1155/2016/2627181. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
7
Expectations and experiences of investigators and parents involved in a clinical trial for Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy.参与杜氏/贝克氏肌肉萎缩症临床试验的研究人员和家长的期望与经历。
Clin Trials. 2014 Feb;11(1):77-85. doi: 10.1177/1740774513512726. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
8
Sham surgery trial controls: perspectives of patients and their relatives.假手术试验对照组:患者及其亲属的观点。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012 Jul;7(3):15-28. doi: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.3.15.

本文引用的文献

1
Unilateral intraputamenal glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in patients with Parkinson disease: response to 1 year of treatment and 1 year of withdrawal.帕金森病患者单侧壳核内注射胶质细胞源性神经营养因子:1年治疗及1年撤药后的反应
J Neurosurg. 2007 Apr;106(4):614-20. doi: 10.3171/jns.2007.106.4.614.
2
Point source concentration of GDNF may explain failure of phase II clinical trial.胶质细胞源性神经营养因子的点源浓度可能解释了II期临床试验的失败。
Exp Neurol. 2006 Dec;202(2):497-505. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.07.015. Epub 2006 Sep 7.
3
GDNF in Parkinson disease: an object lesson in the tyranny of type II.
J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Jul 30;163(2):190-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.06.015. Epub 2006 Jul 28.
4
GDNF in treatment of Parkinson's disease: response to editorial.胶质细胞源性神经营养因子治疗帕金森病:对社论的回应
Lancet Neurol. 2006 Mar;5(3):202-3. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70360-X.
5
Bayesian clinical trials.贝叶斯临床试验
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006 Jan;5(1):27-36. doi: 10.1038/nrd1927.
6
MRI volumetric and intensity analysis of the cerebellum in Parkinson's disease patients infused with glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF).对注入胶质细胞源性神经营养因子(GDNF)的帕金森病患者小脑进行MRI容积和强度分析。
Exp Neurol. 2006 Apr;198(2):450-6. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.12.021. Epub 2006 Feb 7.
7
Randomized controlled trial of intraputamenal glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor infusion in Parkinson disease.帕金森病中脑内注射胶质细胞源性神经营养因子的随机对照试验。
Ann Neurol. 2006 Mar;59(3):459-66. doi: 10.1002/ana.20737.
8
The hard way to a Bill of Rights.通往权利法案的艰难之路。
Lancet Neurol. 2005 Dec;4(12):787. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70228-3.
9
The physician/investigator's obligation to patients participating in research: the case of placebo controlled trials.医生/研究者对参与研究的患者的责任:以安慰剂对照试验为例。
J Law Med Ethics. 2005 Fall;33(3):575-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2005.tb00520.x.
10
Ethics, methodology and the use of placebo controls in surgical trials.外科试验中的伦理学、方法学及安慰剂对照的应用
Brain Res Bull. 2005 Oct 30;67(4):290-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.06.028.