• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

州烟草控制政策在不同种族和族裔群体中的差异影响。

Differential impact of state tobacco control policies among race and ethnic groups.

作者信息

Tauras John A

机构信息

Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Chicago, IL 60607-7121, USA.

出版信息

Addiction. 2007 Oct;102 Suppl 2:95-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01960.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01960.x
PMID:17850619
Abstract

AIMS

This paper describes patterns of racial and ethnic cigarette use in the United States and discusses changes in state-level tobacco control policies. Moreover, this paper reviews the existing econometric literature on racial and ethnic smoking and discusses the limitations of that research. Finally, this paper outlines an agenda for future research.

METHODS

Patterns of racial and ethnic smoking and changes in state-level tobacco control policies in the United States were obtained from a variety of sources, including surveys and government and private documents and databases. After an extensive literature search was completed, the existing research was scrutinized and recommendations for much-needed future research were put forth.

FINDINGS

Despite the fact that certain racial and ethnic minorities bear a disproportionate share of the overall health burden of tobacco, less than a handful of econometric studies have examined the effects of state-level public policies on racial and ethnic smoking. The existing literature finds Hispanics and African Americans to be more responsive to changes in cigarette prices than whites. Only one study examined other state-level tobacco policies. The findings from that study implied that adolescent white male smoking was responsive to changes in smoke-free air laws, while adolescent black smoking was responsive to changes in youth access laws.

CONCLUSIONS

While much has been learned from prior econometric studies on racial and ethnic smoking in the United States, the existing literature suffers from numerous limitations that should be addressed in future research. Additional research that focuses on races and ethnicities other than white, black and Hispanic is warranted. Furthermore, future studies should use more recent data, hold sentiment toward tobacco constant and control for a comprehensive set of tobacco policies that take into account not only the presence of the laws, but also the level of restrictiveness of each policy.

摘要

目的

本文描述了美国不同种族和族裔的香烟使用模式,并讨论了州级烟草控制政策的变化。此外,本文回顾了现有的关于种族和族裔吸烟问题的计量经济学文献,并讨论了该研究的局限性。最后,本文概述了未来研究的议程。

方法

美国不同种族和族裔的吸烟模式以及州级烟草控制政策的变化来自各种来源,包括调查、政府和私人文件及数据库。在完成广泛的文献搜索后,对现有研究进行了审查,并提出了急需的未来研究建议。

结果

尽管某些种族和族裔少数群体承担了与烟草相关的总体健康负担中不成比例的份额,但只有少数计量经济学研究考察了州级公共政策对种族和族裔吸烟的影响。现有文献发现,西班牙裔和非裔美国人比白人对香烟价格变化更敏感。只有一项研究考察了其他州级烟草政策。该研究的结果表明,青少年白人男性吸烟对无烟空气法的变化有反应,而青少年黑人吸烟对青少年获取烟草法的变化有反应。

结论

虽然从美国先前关于种族和族裔吸烟的计量经济学研究中学到了很多,但现有文献存在许多局限性,应在未来研究中加以解决。有必要开展更多关注白人、黑人和西班牙裔以外种族和族裔的研究。此外,未来的研究应使用更新的数据,保持对烟草的态度不变,并控制一系列全面的烟草政策,这些政策不仅要考虑法律的存在,还要考虑每项政策的限制程度。

相似文献

1
Differential impact of state tobacco control policies among race and ethnic groups.州烟草控制政策在不同种族和族裔群体中的差异影响。
Addiction. 2007 Oct;102 Suppl 2:95-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01960.x.
2
Recent trends in smoking and the role of public policies: results from the SimSmoke tobacco control policy simulation model.吸烟的近期趋势及公共政策的作用:来自SimSmoke烟草控制政策模拟模型的结果
Addiction. 2005 Oct;100(10):1526-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01205.x.
3
Public attitudes about cigarette smoking: results from the 1990 Smoking Activity Volunteer Executed Survey.公众对吸烟的态度:1990年吸烟行为志愿者执行调查的结果。
Public Health Rep. 1994 Jan-Feb;109(1):125-34.
4
The Healthy People 2010 smoking prevalence and tobacco control objectives: results from the SimSmoke tobacco control policy simulation model (United States).《健康人民2010》吸烟流行率及烟草控制目标:来自SimSmoke烟草控制政策模拟模型的结果(美国)
Cancer Causes Control. 2005 May;16(4):359-71. doi: 10.1007/s10552-004-7841-4.
5
Identifying health disparities across the tobacco continuum.识别烟草连续体中的健康差异。
Addiction. 2007 Oct;102 Suppl 2:5-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01952.x.
6
Prevalence of cigarette use among 14 racial/ethnic populations--United States, 1999-2001.1999 - 2001年美国14个种族/族裔人群中的吸烟率
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004 Jan 30;53(3):49-52.
7
Tobacco control policies and youth smoking: evidence from a new era.烟草控制政策与青少年吸烟:新时代的证据
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 2005;16:277-91.
8
Racial/ethnic variation in cigarette smoking among the civilian US population by occupation and industry, TUS-CPS 1998-1999.1998 - 1999年美国民用人口中按职业和行业划分的吸烟情况的种族/族裔差异,美国当前人口调查(TUS - CPS)
Prev Med. 2005 Aug;41(2):597-606. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.12.004.
9
Curbing adolescent smoking: a review of the effectiveness of various policies.遏制青少年吸烟:各项政策有效性综述
Yale J Biol Med. 2005 Jan;78(1):37-44.
10
Tobacco control in the United States--recent progress and opportunities.美国的烟草控制——近期进展与机遇
CA Cancer J Clin. 2009 Nov-Dec;59(6):352-65. doi: 10.3322/caac.20037.

引用本文的文献

1
Tobacco Control Policies and Sociodemographic Disparities in Cigarette Smoking Behaviors in the U.S.: A Systematic Review Protocol.美国烟草控制政策与吸烟行为中的社会人口学差异:一项系统评价方案
AJPM Focus. 2024 Jul 3;3(5):100256. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2024.100256. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
A thematic content analysis of 2010-2015 state tobacco control legislation in the United States: Bill rationales and priority populations.2010 - 2015年美国州级烟草控制立法的主题内容分析:法案依据及重点人群
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Sep 27;36:102446. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102446. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Attitudes about Cigarette Smoking, Perceived Consequences of Smoking, and Seeking Assistance with Cessation among Black and White Cigarette Smokers: A Qualitative Study.
黑人和白人吸烟者对吸烟的态度、对吸烟后果的认知以及寻求戒烟帮助:一项定性研究。
J Smok Cessat. 2023 May 20;2023:9298027. doi: 10.1155/2023/9298027. eCollection 2023.
4
Differences among factors associated with tobacco product use among Black and White adolescents: A cross-sectional analysis of wave one of the PATH study 2013-2014.黑人和白人青少年烟草制品使用相关因素的差异:2013 - 2014年PATH研究第一波的横断面分析
Tob Induc Dis. 2023 May 5;21:54. doi: 10.18332/tid/161932. eCollection 2023.
5
Mobile Health Tobacco Cessation Interventions to Promote Health Equity: Current Perspectives.促进健康公平的移动健康戒烟干预措施:当前观点
Front Digit Health. 2022 Jun 30;4:821049. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.821049. eCollection 2022.
6
State-Level Patterns and Trends in Cigarette Smoking Across Racial and Ethnic Groups in the United States, 2011-2018.美国 2011-2018 年不同种族和族裔群体的香烟消费的州级模式和趋势。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2021 May 6;18:E44. doi: 10.5888/pcd18.200507.
7
Policies that limit youth access and exposure to tobacco: a scientific neglect of the first stages of the policy process.限制青少年获取和接触烟草的政策:政策过程初期的科学忽视。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 26;19(1):825. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7073-x.
8
Longitudinal Associations of Cigarette Prices With Smoking Cessation: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study.香烟价格与戒烟的纵向关联:年轻人冠状动脉风险发展研究。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Apr 17;21(5):678-685. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty109.
9
A Systematic Review of Neighborhood Disparities in Point-of-Sale Tobacco Marketing.售点烟草营销中邻里差异的系统评价
Am J Public Health. 2015 Sep;105(9):e8-18. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302777. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
10
Impact of state cigarette taxes on disparities in maternal smoking during pregnancy.州香烟税对孕妇吸烟差异的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Aug;104(8):1464-70. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301955. Epub 2014 Jun 12.