Egan Matt, Petticrew Mark, Ogilvie David, Hamilton Val, Drever Frances
MRC SPHSU, 4 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, UK.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Oct;61(10):862-70. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.053231.
Debates on government privatisation policies have often focused on the alleged effects of privatisation on health and safety. A systematic review (through Quality of Reporting of Meta-analysis) of the effects of privatising industries and utilities on the health (including injuries) of employees and the public was conducted. The data sources were electronic databases (medical, social science and economic), bibliographies and expert contacts. Experimental and quasi-experimental studies were sought, dating from 1945, from any Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development member country (in any language) that evaluated the health outcomes of such interventions. Eleven highly heterogeneous studies that evaluated the health impacts of privatisation of building, water, paper, cement, bus, rail, mining, electric and gas companies were identified. The most robust study found increases in the measures of stress-related ill health among employees after a privatisation intervention involving company downsizing. No robust evidence was found to link privatisation with increased injury rates for employees or customers. In conclusion, public debates on the health and safety implications of privatisation have a poor empirical base, which policy makers and researchers need to address. Some evidence suggests that adverse health outcomes could result from redundancies associated with privatisation.
关于政府私有化政策的辩论常常聚焦于私有化对健康与安全的所谓影响。我们通过对荟萃分析报告质量的系统回顾,研究了行业和公用事业私有化对员工及公众健康(包括伤害)的影响。数据来源包括电子数据库(医学、社会科学和经济领域)、参考文献以及专家联系方式。我们检索了自1945年以来,来自任何经济合作与发展组织成员国(以任何语言发表)的实验性和准实验性研究,这些研究评估了此类干预措施的健康结果。我们识别出了11项高度异质性的研究,这些研究评估了建筑、水务、造纸、水泥、公交、铁路、采矿、电力和燃气公司私有化对健康的影响。最有力的研究发现,在涉及公司裁员的私有化干预后,员工中与压力相关的健康问题指标有所增加。没有确凿证据表明私有化与员工或客户的受伤率上升有关。总之,关于私有化对健康和安全影响的公众辩论缺乏实证依据,政策制定者和研究人员需要解决这一问题。一些证据表明,与私有化相关的裁员可能会导致不良健康后果。