• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类暴露于电磁场。标准与法规。

Exposure of humans to electromagnetic fields. Standards and regulations.

作者信息

Vecchia Paolo

机构信息

Dipartimento di Tecnologie e Salute, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Roma, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2007;43(3):260-7.

PMID:17938457
Abstract

Biological and health effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) have been investigated for many years. Exposure standards have been developed internationally, that provide adequate protection against all known adverse effects of exposure to EMF. The guidelines developed by the International Commission on Non Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) are widely recognized and have formed the basis for national regulations in several countries. The two-level structure, with basic restrictions and reference levels, allows the standards to be adapted to virtually any exposure condition, including complex situations at workplaces. However, concerns for hypothesized, but unproven, long-term effects of chronic exposure to low-level EMF have created a demand for precautionary measures beyond the standards for recognized, acute effects. Such measures, if deemed justified by social considerations, including public anxiety, should be separate from exposure standards, and adopted with special care to avoid undermining the credibility of science-based guidelines, and of health authorities.

摘要

电磁场(EMF)的生物和健康影响已被研究多年。国际上已制定了暴露标准,这些标准能提供充分保护,防止暴露于EMF的所有已知不良影响。国际非电离辐射防护委员会(ICNIRP)制定的指南得到广泛认可,并已成为多个国家国家法规的基础。具有基本限制和参考水平的两级结构使这些标准几乎能适应任何暴露条件,包括工作场所的复杂情况。然而,对于长期暴露于低水平EMF的假设但未经证实的长期影响的担忧,引发了对超出公认急性影响标准的预防措施的需求。如果社会考虑因素(包括公众焦虑)认为这些措施合理,那么这些措施应与暴露标准分开,并应特别谨慎地采用,以免损害基于科学的指南和卫生当局的可信度。

相似文献

1
Exposure of humans to electromagnetic fields. Standards and regulations.人类暴露于电磁场。标准与法规。
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2007;43(3):260-7.
2
A comparison of important international and national standards for limiting exposure to EMF including the scientific rationale.对包括科学依据在内的限制电磁场暴露的重要国际和国家标准的比较。
Health Phys. 2007 Jun;92(6):635-41. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000248111.57701.27.
3
[Polish guidelines of 2001 for maximum admissible intensities in high frequency EMF versus European Union recommendations].[2001年波兰关于高频电磁场最大允许强度的指南与欧盟建议对比]
Med Pr. 2003;54(2):181-7.
4
[Limitations of occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields adopted by Polish law from the perspectives of international documents with particular reference to fields of low and medium frequencies].[从国际文件角度看波兰法律所采用的职业性电磁场暴露限制,特别提及低频和中频电磁场领域]
Med Pr. 2003;54(3):269-78.
5
[National and international standards for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields].[限制电磁场暴露的国家和国际标准]
G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2003 Jul-Sep;25(3):376-7.
6
Low-level exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: health effects and research needs.低水平射频电磁场暴露:健康影响与研究需求。
Bioelectromagnetics. 1998;19(1):1-19.
7
[Protection against electromagnetic fields 0-300 GHz in Poland. New regulations and perspectives if their harmonization wit the European Union requirements].[波兰针对0至300吉赫兹电磁场的防护。新法规及其与欧盟要求协调统一的前景]
Med Pr. 2003;54(2):197-201.
8
[Hygienic assessment of sources of electromagnetic fields using revised and new standards of maximum admissible intensities].[使用修订后的和新的最大允许强度标准对电磁场源进行卫生评估]
Med Pr. 2004;55(1):55-62.
9
[Measurements of electromagnetic fields and evaluation of occupational exposure: PN-T-06580:2002 requirements and principles adopted in the European Union].[电磁场测量与职业暴露评估:PN-T-06580:2002欧盟采用的要求和原则]
Med Pr. 2003;54(3):279-84.
10
[Problems with implementation of Polish standards on admissible electromagnetic field levels by the State Sanitary Inspectorate and of the measuring teams].[国家卫生监督局及测量团队在实施波兰关于可允许电磁场水平标准方面存在的问题]
Med Pr. 2003;54(3):289-90.

引用本文的文献

1
An effective utilization of MXene and its effect on electromagnetic interference shielding: flexible, free-standing and thermally conductive composite from MXene-PAT-poly(-aminophenol)-polyaniline co-polymer.MXene的有效利用及其对电磁干扰屏蔽的影响:基于MXene-PAT-聚(对氨基酚)-聚苯胺共聚物的柔性、自立式和导热复合材料。
RSC Adv. 2020 Jan 8;10(3):1613-1633. doi: 10.1039/c9ra09522e. eCollection 2020 Jan 7.
2
The Effects of Mobile Phone Radiofrequency Radiation on Cochlear Stria Marginal Cells in Sprague-Dawley Rats.手机射频辐射对 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠耳蜗边缘细胞的影响。
Bioelectromagnetics. 2020 Apr;41(3):219-229. doi: 10.1002/bem.22255. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
3
Exposure to cell phone radiofrequency changes corticotrophin hormone levels and histology of the brain and adrenal glands in male Wistar rat.
暴露于手机射频会改变雄性Wistar大鼠的促肾上腺皮质激素水平以及大脑和肾上腺的组织学。
Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2018 Dec;21(12):1269-1274. doi: 10.22038/ijbms.2018.29567.7133.
4
Sensitivity of spiral ganglion neurons to damage caused by mobile phone electromagnetic radiation will increase in lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in vitro model.在脂多糖诱导的体外炎症模型中,螺旋神经节神经元对手机电磁辐射造成损伤的敏感性会增加。
J Neuroinflammation. 2015 May 29;12:105. doi: 10.1186/s12974-015-0300-1.
5
Searching for the perfect wave: the effect of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on cells.寻找完美波:射频电磁场对细胞的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2014 Mar 27;15(4):5366-87. doi: 10.3390/ijms15045366.
6
Mobile phone radiation health risk controversy: the reliability and sufficiency of science behind the safety standards.手机辐射健康风险争议:安全标准背后科学的可靠性和充分性。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2010 Jan 27;8(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-8-2.
7
The precautionary principle in the context of mobile phone and base station radiofrequency exposures.手机与基站射频辐射环境下的预防原则
Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Sep;117(9):1329-32. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0900727. Epub 2009 May 18.