Gozal David, Kheirandish-Gozal Leila
Kosair Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Louisville School of Medicine, 570 South Preston Street, Suite 204, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Feb 15;177(4):369-75. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200608-1190PP. Epub 2007 Nov 1.
Sleep-disordered breathing and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are highly prevalent disorders throughout the lifespan, which may affect up to 2-10% of the population, and have now been firmly associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular and neurobehavioral complications. Nevertheless, the overall pathophysiologic mechanisms mediating end-organ injury in OSA remain undefined, particularly due to the very frequent coexistence of other disease states, such as obesity, that clearly complicate the potential cause-effect relationships. Two major, and to some extent overlapping, mechanisms have been proposed to explain the morbid consequences of OSA, namely increased generation and propagation of reactive oxygen species and initiation and amplification of inflammatory processes. The evidence supporting the validity of these concepts as well as that detracting from such mechanisms will be critically reviewed in the context of clinical and laboratory-based approaches. In addition, some of the contradictory issues raised by such evaluation of the literature will be interpreted in the context of putative modifications of the individual responses to OSA, as determined by genetic variants among susceptibility-related genes, and also by potential environmental modulators of the phenotypic expression of any particular end-organ morbidity associated with OSA.
睡眠呼吸障碍和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)在人的一生中都极为普遍,可能影响高达2%至10%的人群,并且目前已确凿地与心血管和神经行为并发症风险增加相关联。然而,介导OSA终末器官损伤的整体病理生理机制仍不明确,尤其是因为其他疾病状态(如肥胖)非常常见,这显然使潜在的因果关系变得复杂。已经提出了两种主要且在一定程度上相互重叠的机制来解释OSA的不良后果,即活性氧的生成和扩散增加以及炎症过程的启动和放大。将在临床和基于实验室的方法背景下对支持这些概念有效性的证据以及削弱这些机制的证据进行批判性审查。此外,这种文献评估所引发的一些矛盾问题将在个体对OSA反应的假定改变的背景下进行解读,这些改变由易感性相关基因中的基因变异以及与OSA相关的任何特定终末器官发病表型表达的潜在环境调节因素所决定。