Robbins A H, Sargent E N, Vincent M E, Boswell W, Meyers H I
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1976 Aug;127(2):257-60. doi: 10.2214/ajr.127.2.257.
A double-blind comparison of two intravenous cholangiocholecystographic agents of similar molecular structure, meglumine iodoxamate and meglumine iodipamide, was carried out in 90 patients. Each produced a comparably high percentage of satisfactory examinations. A similar pattern of excretion speed and intensity was noted for each, though meglumine iodoxamate appeared to be slightly more effective in patients with elevated serum bilirubin. Less evidence of hepatic toxicity and fewer and less serious adverse side effects were observed in patients given the newer agent, meglumine iodoxamate.
对90名患者进行了分子结构相似的两种静脉胆管胆囊造影剂——碘番酸葡甲胺和碘他拉葡甲胺的双盲比较。每种造影剂产生满意检查结果的比例都相当高。两种造影剂的排泄速度和强度模式相似,不过碘番酸葡甲胺在血清胆红素升高的患者中似乎效果稍好。在使用较新的造影剂碘番酸葡甲胺的患者中,观察到的肝毒性证据较少,不良副作用也较少且不太严重。