Romero Pablo V, Rodriguez Benigno, de Oliveira Daniela, Blanch L, Manresa Federico
Laboratorio de Función Pulmonar, Servicio de Neumologia, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2007;2(3):381-91.
Spirometry is difficult for some COPD patient to perform. Volumetric capnography could be a second choice test to evaluate the severity of functional disturbances. The aim of this work is to test this hypothesis. A total number of 98 subjects were classified either as normal ex-smokers (N=14) or COPD patients. The latter were staged following GOLD recommendations. Spirometry and volumetric capnography recordings were obtained from each patient. Spirometry parameters, Bohr Dead Space (V(D)Bohr), Airways Dead Space from the pre-interface expirate corrected curve (V(D)aw), Phase III slope (Sl(III)) and Volume of alveolar ejection (V(AE)) were measured. Index of Ventilatory Efficiency (IVE), and Index of Airways Heterogeneity (IAH) were calculated as: IVE = V(AE)/(V(T) - V(D)aw) and IAH = 1-[(V(T)-V(D)Bohr)/(V(T) - V(D)aw)]. In ANOCOVA analysis IAH showed the greatest association with stage (F >40), with no significant covariant dependence on V(T). A receiver operating characteristics curve analysis showed values of the area under the curve greater than 0.9 for IAH and IVE at all stage levels, with a sensitivity = specificity value greater than 80%. We conclude that IAH and IVE can be used when spirometry cannot be reliably performed, as an alternative test to evaluate the degree of functional involvement in COPD patients.
对于一些慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者来说,肺活量测定法很难实施。容积式二氧化碳描记法可能是评估功能障碍严重程度的第二种选择测试。这项工作的目的是验证这一假设。总共98名受试者被分类为正常戒烟者(N = 14)或COPD患者。后者根据全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病倡议(GOLD)的建议进行分期。从每位患者获取肺活量测定和容积式二氧化碳描记法记录。测量肺活量测定参数、玻尔死腔(V(D)Bohr)、来自界面前呼气校正曲线的气道死腔(V(D)aw)、第三阶段斜率(Sl(III))和肺泡排出量(V(AE))。通气效率指数(IVE)和气道异质性指数(IAH)计算如下:IVE = V(AE)/(V(T) - V(D)aw),IAH = 1 - [(V(T)-V(D)Bohr)/(V(T) - V(D)aw)]。在协方差分析中,IAH与分期显示出最大关联(F > 40),对V(T)无显著协变量依赖性。受试者工作特征曲线分析表明,在所有分期水平上,IAH和IVE的曲线下面积值均大于0.9,灵敏度=特异度值大于80%。我们得出结论,当肺活量测定法无法可靠实施时,IAH和IVE可作为评估COPD患者功能受累程度的替代测试。