Hansen Steffen Foss, Michelson Evan S, Kamper Anja, Borling Pernille, Stuer-Lauridsen Frank, Baun Anders
Department of Environmental Engineering, NanoDTU Environment & Health, Technical University of Denmark, DTU-Building 113, Kgs Lyngby 2800, Denmark.
Ecotoxicology. 2008 Jul;17(5):438-47. doi: 10.1007/s10646-008-0210-4. Epub 2008 May 3.
Exposure assessment is crucial for risk assessment for nanomaterials. We propose a framework to aid exposure assessment in consumer products. We determined the location of the nanomaterials and the chemical identify of the 580 products listed in the inventory maintained by the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, of which 37% used nanoparticles suspended in liquids, whereas <1% contained "free airborne nanoparticles". C(60) is currently only used as suspended nanoparticles in liquids and nanosilver is used more as surface bound nanoparticles than as particles suspended in liquids. Based on the location of the nanostructure we were able to further group the products into categories of: (1) expected, (2) possible, and (3) no expected exposure. Most products fall into the category of expected exposure, but we were not able to complete a quantitative exposure assessment mainly due to the lack of information on the concentration of the nanomaterial in the products--a problem that regulators and industry will have to address if we are to have realistic exposure assessment in the future. To illustrate the workability of our procedure, we applied it to four product scenarios using the best estimates available and/or worst-case assumptions. Using the best estimates available and/or worst-case assumptions we estimated the consumer exposure to be 26, 15, and 44 microg kg(-1) bw year(-1) for a facial lotion, a fluid product, and a spray product containing nanoparticles, respectively. The application of sun lotion containing 2% nanoparticles result in an exposure of 56.7 mg kg(-1) bw d(-1) for a 2-year-old child, if the amounts applied correspond to the European Commission recommendations on use of sunscreen.
暴露评估对于纳米材料的风险评估至关重要。我们提出了一个框架来辅助消费品中的暴露评估。我们确定了纳米材料的位置以及伍德罗·威尔逊国际学者中心所维护清单中列出的580种产品的化学标识,其中37%使用悬浮在液体中的纳米颗粒,而<1%含有“游离空气传播纳米颗粒”。C(60)目前仅作为悬浮在液体中的纳米颗粒使用,纳米银更多地用作表面结合纳米颗粒而非悬浮在液体中的颗粒。基于纳米结构的位置,我们能够将产品进一步分为以下几类:(1)预期暴露,(2)可能暴露,以及(3)无预期暴露。大多数产品属于预期暴露类别,但我们无法完成定量暴露评估,主要原因是缺乏产品中纳米材料浓度的信息——如果我们未来要进行实际的暴露评估,监管机构和行业必须解决这个问题。为了说明我们程序的可操作性,我们使用可得的最佳估计值和/或最坏情况假设将其应用于四种产品场景。使用可得的最佳估计值和/或最坏情况假设,我们估计对于含有纳米颗粒的面部乳液、流体产品和喷雾产品,消费者的暴露量分别为26、15和44微克/千克体重·年。如果涂抹量符合欧盟委员会关于防晒霜使用的建议,对于一名2岁儿童,涂抹含2%纳米颗粒的防晒霜会导致暴露量为56.7毫克/千克体重·天。