• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种将曲线拟合到响应时间测量值的分层方法。

A hierarchical approach for fitting curves to response time measurements.

作者信息

Rouder Jeffrey N, Tuerlinckx Francis, Speckman Paul, Lu Jun, Gomez Pablo

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Dec;15(6):1201-8. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1201.

DOI:10.3758/PBR.15.6.1201
PMID:19001591
Abstract

Understanding how response time (RT) changes with manipulations has been critical in distinguishing among theories in cognition. It is well known that aggregating data distorts functional relationships (e.g., Estes, 1956). Less well appreciated is a second pitfall: Minimizing squared errors (i.e., OLS regression) also distorts estimated functional forms with RT data. We discuss three properties of RT that should be modeled for accurate analysis and, on the basis of these three properties, provide a hierarchical Weibull regression model for regressing RT onto covariates. Hierarchical regression model analysis of lexical decision task data reveals that RT decreases as a power function of word frequency with the scale of RT decreasing 11% for every doubling of word frequency. A detailed discussion of the model and analysis techniques are presented as archived materials and may be downloaded from www.psychonomic.org/archive.

摘要

理解反应时间(RT)如何随操作而变化,对于区分认知理论至关重要。众所周知,汇总数据会扭曲函数关系(例如,埃斯蒂斯,1956年)。另一个不太为人所知的陷阱是:最小化平方误差(即普通最小二乘法回归)也会扭曲RT数据的估计函数形式。我们讨论了RT的三个属性,为了进行准确分析应对其进行建模,并基于这三个属性,提供了一个将RT回归到协变量上的分层威布尔回归模型。对词汇判断任务数据的分层回归模型分析表明,RT随着词频的幂函数而降低,词频每翻倍,RT的尺度就会降低11%。模型和分析技术的详细讨论作为存档材料呈现,可从www.psychonomic.org/archive下载。

相似文献

1
A hierarchical approach for fitting curves to response time measurements.一种将曲线拟合到响应时间测量值的分层方法。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Dec;15(6):1201-8. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1201.
2
Adult age differences in letter-level and word-level processing.成人在字母层面和单词层面处理上的年龄差异。
Psychol Aging. 1991 Jun;6(2):261-71. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.6.2.261.
3
Associated or dissociated effects of syllable frequency in lexical decision and naming.词汇判断和命名中音节频率的关联或分离效应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Apr;13(2):339-45. doi: 10.3758/bf03193854.
4
Is the go/no-go lexical decision task preferable to the yes/no task with developing readers?发展性阅读者更倾向于使用“是/否”词汇判断任务,而不是“是/否”任务吗?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Sep;110(1):125-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 May 11.
5
Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in word identification: a matter of some moment?区分单词识别中的常见过程和特定任务过程:这是一个重要问题吗?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Mar;27(2):514-44. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.514.
6
Statistical models of morphology predict eye-tracking measures during visual word recognition.形态学的统计模型预测了在视觉单词识别过程中的眼动追踪测量。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Oct;47(7):1245-1269. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00931-7.
7
Age of acquisition estimates for 1,208 ambiguous and polysemous words.获得 1,208 个歧义与多义词的习得年龄估计值。
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Mar;43(1):89-96. doi: 10.3758/s13428-010-0027-y.
8
Category norms for 500 Spanish words in five semantic categories.五个语义类别中500个西班牙语单词的类别规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2005 Aug;37(3):385-97. doi: 10.3758/bf03192708.
9
Examining word processing via a megastudy of conditional reading aloud.通过条件朗读的大规模研究来审视文字处理。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Nov;71(11):2295-2313. doi: 10.1177/1747021817741269. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
10
Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.视觉单词识别中反应时间分布的相加和交互作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Mar;33(2):274-96. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.274.

引用本文的文献

1
Modeling of control over task switching and cross-task interference supports a two-dimensional model of cognitive stability and flexibility.任务切换与跨任务干扰控制的建模支持了认知稳定性与灵活性的二维模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02712-7.
2
Putting the individual into reliability: Bayesian testing of homogeneous within-person variance in hierarchical models.将个体纳入可靠性:层次模型中个体内同质性方差的贝叶斯检验。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Jun;54(3):1272-1290. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01646-x. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
3
Bayesian Multivariate Mixed-Effects Location Scale Modeling of Longitudinal Relations Among Affective Traits, States, and Physical Activity.

本文引用的文献

1
Explanatory Item Response Models: A Generalized Linear and Nonlinear Approach by P. de Boeck and M. Wilson and Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel, Longitudinal and Structural Equation Models by A. Skrondal and S. Rabe-Hesketh.《解释性项目反应模型:P. 德博克和M. 威尔逊的广义线性与非线性方法》以及《广义潜在变量建模:A. 斯克隆达尔和S. R. 拉贝 - 赫斯克思的多层次、纵向和结构方程模型》
Psychometrika. 2006 Jun;71(2):415-418. doi: 10.1007/s11336-005-1333-7.
2
A model of the go/no-go task.一种停止信号任务模型。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Aug;136(3):389-413. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.389.
3
On the linear relation between the mean and the standard deviation of a response time distribution.
情感特质、状态与身体活动之间纵向关系的贝叶斯多变量混合效应位置尺度建模
Eur J Psychol Assess. 2020 Nov;36(6):981-997. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000624. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
4
Additive and multiplicative probabilistic models of infant looking times.婴儿注视时间的加法和乘法概率模型。
PeerJ. 2021 Jul 15;9:e11771. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11771. eCollection 2021.
5
Beneath the surface: Unearthing within-person variability and mean relations with Bayesian mixed models.表面之下:贝叶斯混合模型挖掘个体内变异性和均值关系。
Psychol Methods. 2021 Feb;26(1):74-89. doi: 10.1037/met0000270. Epub 2020 May 21.
6
A Bayesian nonlinear mixed-effects location scale model for learning.学习的贝叶斯非线性混合效应位置尺度模型。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Oct;51(5):1968-1986. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01255-9.
7
When High-Capacity Readers Slow Down and Low-Capacity Readers Speed Up: Working Memory and Locality Effects.当高能力读者放慢速度而低能力读者加快速度时:工作记忆与局部性效应。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 8;7:280. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00280. eCollection 2016.
8
To transform or not to transform: using generalized linear mixed models to analyse reaction time data.转换还是不转换:使用广义线性混合模型分析反应时间数据。
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 7;6:1171. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01171. eCollection 2015.
9
Additive effects of word frequency and stimulus quality: the influence of trial history and data transformations.词频和刺激质量的累加效应:试验历史和数据转换的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Sep;39(5):1563-71. doi: 10.1037/a0032186. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
10
Random local temporal structure of category fluency responses.类别流畅性反应的随机局部时间结构。
J Comput Neurosci. 2012 Apr;32(2):213-31. doi: 10.1007/s10827-011-0349-5. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
关于反应时间分布的均值与标准差之间的线性关系。
Psychol Rev. 2007 Jul;114(3):830-41. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.830.
4
The functional form of performance improvements in perceptual learning: learning rates and transfer.知觉学习中表现改善的函数形式:学习率与迁移
Psychol Sci. 2007 Jun;18(6):531-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01934.x.
5
Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times.上下文多样性而非词频决定单词命名和词汇判断时间。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Sep;17(9):814-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01787.x.
6
An introduction to Bayesian hierarchical models with an application in the theory of signal detection.贝叶斯层次模型介绍及其在信号检测理论中的应用
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Aug;12(4):573-604. doi: 10.3758/bf03196750.
7
A hierarchical model for estimating response time distributions.一种用于估计响应时间分布的分层模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Apr;12(2):195-223. doi: 10.3758/bf03257252.
8
Serial mechanisms in lexical access: the rank hypothesis.词汇通达中的序列机制:等级假设。
Psychol Rev. 2004 Jul;111(3):721-56. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.721.
9
A mathematical model for simple learning.一种简单学习的数学模型。
Psychol Rev. 1951 Sep;58(5):313-23. doi: 10.1037/h0054388.
10
Strategy execution in cognitive skill learning: an item-level test of candidate models.认知技能学习中的策略执行:候选模型的项目级测试
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jan;30(1):65-82. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.65.