Suppr超能文献

1.5T和3.0T下颈动脉粥样硬化磁共振成像的扫描-重扫及观察者内变异性

Scan-rescan and intra-observer variability of magnetic resonance imaging of carotid atherosclerosis at 1.5 T and 3.0 T.

作者信息

Vidal Arvin, Bureau Yves, Wade Trevor, Spence J David, Rutt Brian K, Fenster Aaron, Parraga Grace

机构信息

Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, 100 Perth Drive, London, N6A 5K8 Canada.

出版信息

Phys Med Biol. 2008 Dec 7;53(23):6821-35. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/23/011. Epub 2008 Nov 12.

Abstract

Carotid atherosclerosis measurements for eight subjects at baseline and 14 +/- 2 days later were examined using 1.5 T and 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A single observer blinded to field strength, subject and timepoint manually segmented carotid artery wall and lumen boundaries in randomized images in five measurement trials. Mean increases in the signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) for T1-weighted images acquired at 3.0 T compared to 1.5 T were 90% (scan) and 80% (rescan). Despite significantly improved SNR and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) for images acquired at 3.0 T, vessel wall volume (VWV) intra-observer variability was not significantly different using coefficients of variation (COV), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). VWV interscan variability and consistency at both field strengths were not statistically different (1.5 T/3.0 T COV = 5.7%/7.8%, R(2) = 0.96 for 1.5 T and R(2) = 0.87 for 3.0 T). A two-way analysis of variance showed a VWV dependence on field strength but not scan timepoint. In addition, a paired t-test showed significant differences in VWV measured at 3.0 T as compared to 1.5 T. These results suggest that although images acquired at 1.5 T have lower SNR and CNR VWV, measurement variability was not significantly different from 3.0 T VWV and that VWV is field-strength dependent which may be an important consideration for longitudinal studies.

摘要

使用1.5T和3.0T磁共振成像(MRI)对8名受试者在基线时以及14±2天后的颈动脉粥样硬化情况进行了检查。一名对场强、受试者和时间点不知情的观察者在五次测量试验中,对随机图像手动分割颈动脉壁和管腔边界。与1.5T相比,3.0T采集的T1加权图像的信噪比(SNR)平均增加了90%(扫描)和80%(重新扫描)。尽管3.0T采集的图像的SNR和对比噪声比(CNR)有显著改善,但使用变异系数(COV)和组内相关系数(ICC)时,观察者内部血管壁体积(VWV)的变异性没有显著差异。两种场强下的VWV扫描间变异性和一致性在统计学上没有差异(1.5T/3.0T的COV分别为5.7%/7.8%,1.5T时R² = 0.96,3.0T时R² = 0.87)。双向方差分析显示VWV依赖于场强,但不依赖于扫描时间点。此外,配对t检验显示3.0T时测量的VWV与1.5T时相比有显著差异。这些结果表明,尽管1.5T采集的图像的SNR和CNR以及VWV较低,但测量变异性与3.0T的VWV没有显著差异,并且VWV依赖于场强,这可能是纵向研究的一个重要考虑因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验